$4.7 Million in Small Amounts of Money Donated to Democrats – Apparently Without the Donors’ Knowledge

We’ve seen a lot of concerning things about the effort to weaponize the government to control the political agenda.

But perhaps one of the most concerning pieces of information dropped on Monday with word that the FBI was trying to develop “sources” within Christian and Catholic churches to “combat domestic terrorism,” in what looks like an effort to have people spying and reporting on their fellow parishioners.

The House Weaponization Committee just released a letter about internal documents showing this FBI effort. According to the letter, the FBI was targeting “mainline Catholic parishes,” looking into them for “source development,” according to Judiciary Committee Chair Jim Jordan (R-OH).

In addition, according to Jordan, the FBI expressed interest in “leverag[ing] existing sources and/or initiating [ing] Type 5 Assessments to develop new sources with the placement and access.” And, in another example, the agency cited a desire to sensitize religious congregations “to the warning signs of radicalization and enlist their assistance to serve as suspicious activity tripwires.”

“Based on the limited information produced by the FBI to the Committee, we now know that the FBI relied on at least one undercover agent to produce its analysis, and that the FBI proposed that its agents engage in outreach to Catholic parishes to develop sources among the clergy and church leadership to inform on Americans practicing their faith,” Jordan wrote in a letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray on Monday.

Jordan also dropped a subpoena on the FBI for related documents that they have failed to turn over, despite requests.

Jordan called the actions of the FBI “outrageous.” He said that the FBI needed to comply and answer what they were doing here trying to use “Catholic houses of worship as potential sources to monitor and report on their parishioners.”

“Americans attend church to worship and congregate for their spiritual and personal betterment,” the letter continued. “They must be free to exercise their fundamental First Amendment rights without worrying that the FBI may have planted so-called “tripwire” sources or other informants in their houses of worship.”

We previously reported on how the FBI appeared to be targeting “Radical-Traditionalist Catholics” and painting them as likely to be some kind of extremist group based upon the determination of the radical SPLC. But what Jordan is saying in this letter seems to go even further than that. What the “threat” from Catholics is supposed to be isn’t clear. I haven’t heard of any systemic terrorist threat based upon Catholicism, much less “mainline Catholics.” Last time I checked there were “threats” from radical leftists trying to attack churches and pro-life centers, but the FBI doesn’t seem to be too interested in them. Where are all the investigations into the thousands of radicals who set the country ablaze in 2020? Few and far between. So why is the FBI targeting “mainline” churches for source development to fink on their parishioners? Or any other...

Morning Mistress

 

The 90 Miles Mystery Video: Nyctophilia Edition #1354

Before You Click On The "Read More" Link, 

Please Only Do So If You Are Over 21 Years Old.

If You are Easily Upset, Triggered Or Offended, This Is Not The Place For You.  

Please Leave Silently Into The Night......

The 90 Miles Mystery Box: Episode #2049

You have come across a mystery box. But what is inside? 

It could be literally anything from the serene to the horrific, 

from the beautiful to the repugnant, 

from the mysterious to the familiar.

If you decide to open it, you could be disappointed, 

you could be inspired, you could be appalled. 

This is not for the faint of heart or the easily offended. 

You have been warned.

Girls With Guns

Democrats decide that a little bit of insurrection is good sometimes

The Democratic Party and its media allies have made a new rule: “Insurrections” are good, at least when Democrats are doing it.

Two Tennessee lawmakers were expelled from the legislature for taking bullhorns to the House floor to lead the protests of the gun control mob outside its doors. In the words of one of these lawmakers, “We occupied the House floor today,” taking over the session and preventing the legislature from continuing its normal business.

DEMOCRATS RALLY AROUND TENNESSEE LAWMAKERS AFTER EXPULSION FOR GUN PROTEST

In short, a mob of protesters was initiating violence with police officers while elected Democratic representatives carried out an extension of their protest and “occupied” the House floor in an attempt to subvert the legislative process because they weren’t going to get the result that they wanted.

What makes this different from the moronic rioters on Jan. 6? The smaller scale? The fact that the overgrown children occupying the House floor happened to be legislators? In the end, the motivation was the same. The biggest difference was that members of the state House took an active role in this outside of legislative means, which is why they were expelled.

Ah, but some mobs and occupations are acceptable now, according to the Democratic Party. President Joe Biden and former President Barack Obama were among those saying that the mob tactics were “peaceful” and that not allowing people to occupy the House floor whenever they feel like it is “a sign of weakness.” The hysterics reached an 11 at MSNBC, which of course chalked this up to racism.

Meanwhile, the Biden administration declared that “inaction is unacceptable” when it comes to gun control. What logically follows is that occupying the House floor is not only acceptable to oppose this “inaction” but that it is necessary and encouraged. Mobs and mob tactics are good when Democrats like the cause. What’s a little insurrection when it comes to an assault weapons ban?

Everyone remembers the nonchalant attitude Democrats took toward Black Lives Matter riots. Had then-President Donald Trump won the 2020 election, no one believes that Democrats would be so outraged by a Jan. 6 riot carried out by Black Lives Matter protesters, for example. We have...

Visage à trois #1366

Three Videos For Your Viewing Pleasure:

Three Additional Bonus Videos:

Quick Hits Of Wisdom, Knowledge And Snark #1027

 

Quick Hits Of Wisdom, Knowledge And Snark #1023

Visage à trois #1365

Three Videos For Your Viewing Pleasure:

Three Additional Bonus Videos:

Quick Hits Of Wisdom, Knowledge And Snark #1026

 

Quick Hits Of Wisdom, Knowledge And Snark #1023

Pfizer’s RSV Vaccine for Older Adults Linked to Guillain-Barré Syndrome, But Drugmaker Says It’s ‘Safe’

People who receive Pfizer’s respiratory syncytial virus vaccine should be monitored for Guillain-Barré syndrome, according to the authors of a Pfizer-funded study published this week in the New England Journal of Medicine.

People who receive Pfizer’s respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine should be monitored for Guillain-Barré syndrome, according to the authors of a Pfizer-funded study published this week in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM).

The paper — one of several published Wednesday reporting interim analyses for Pfizer’s phase 3 clinical trials for the RSV vaccine — concluded the vaccine was effective in preventing RSV in adults age 60 and over “without evident safety concerns.”

But that same article also flagged Guillain-Barré syndrome as a safety concern moving forward with the vaccine.

“If RSVpreF vaccine [Pfizer’s RSV vaccine] is approved and recommended, these adverse events warrant close monitoring in future studies and with real-world data and post-marketing surveillance,” the authors of the NEJM study said.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is expected to approve Pfizer’s RSV vaccine for older adults in May.

Safe and effective?

Guillain-Barré syndrome is a rare disorder in which the body’s immune system attacks its own nerves. Symptoms can range from brief weakness to paralysis.

The FDA asked Pfizer to include the condition as an “important potential risk” of the vaccine and to develop a safety study to monitor for potential cases if the shot is approved, CNBC reported.

When the FDA vaccine advisory panel met in February to review Pfizer’s data pre-publication, there was substantial disagreement about the data on safety and effectiveness, although the majority of the committee voted to recommend the vaccine for approval.

Four of 12 committee members voted that the safety data was not adequate for approval — and one abstained — because of their concerns with the Guillain-Barré cases.

Four committee members also voted the evidence of vaccine effectiveness was not adequate for approval, while seven said it was and one member abstained.

In the NEJM study, one person developed Guillain-Barré syndrome and another developed Miller Fisher syndrome, a subset of Guillain-Barré. The symptoms appeared six and seven days post-vaccination, respectively.

The person with Miller Fisher syndrome recovered. The person diagnosed with Guillain-Barré continues to suffer from loss of...

Morning Mistress