CBS News deliberately lies in its headline about Romney's comment on Teachers Unions Contributions.

On cbsnews.com in an article written by Matthew Shelley, the headline read "Romney: Limit teacher contributions to politicians" when in the Interview with NBC's Brian Williams, Romney is clearly talking about teacher's unions. Romney Stated: "I think we have to get the money out of the teachers unions going into campaigns." The headline clearly falsely and intentionally mischaracterizes Romney's comments to fuel media supported false stereotypes and to provide a narrative for unsophisticated readers with no intellectual curiosity to read beyond a headline.

Furthermore, as I parsed through Mr. Shelleys articles, it was stunning to see how the Media propogandists use selected unflattering photos of Republicans in general and Romney in particular to create a narrative that matches their own negative stereotypes of non-leftists.

Dishonesty in the mainstream media. No one should be surprised by this, but we should always be disappointed.

The article is here: http://www.cbsnews.com/8300-503544_162-503544.html?contributor=10471225&tag=contentMain;contentBody

Pictured Above: Useful Idiot Matthew Shelley

Girls with Guns

Never Forget.

Bacon shortage coming?

Say it isn't so!
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-202_162-57519703/global-bacon-shortage-unavoidable-group-says/

Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Girls with Guns

Why Freedom of Speech in the USA will be determined by the status of a French Cartoon.

First of all, I would like to express my deepest gratitude to the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo. Their decision to publish the Islamic Prophet Mohammed was a profile in courage, an act of bravery and integrity.

So, why is it so important that it was published and should be allowed to be published in the USA and the world? In the US, we have freedom of speech, even if that speech offends or is even considered hate speech. While we cannot yell "fire!" in a movie theater, anything short of this is legal and free. If an intolerant group are allowed to determine what we say by simply becoming violent then we have no free speech. The intolerent group can then effectively legislate what we are allowed to say, for instance: If I said, "I think that the practice of forced female circumcism is a violation of human rights" and a particular group stormed a US embassy in say, an Islamic country, because they believed that this showed hatred towards their religion and expressing that belief then became illegal, groups everywhere would learn that all they had to do to suppress free speech would be to become violent.

One of the founders of our great nation, George Washington once said: "If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter." And here is my quote: "When you allow others to determine the definition of evil; hear no evil, speak no evil, have no freedom of speech".

Elements of the islamic world are calling for the banning of this cartoon and the unfinished poorly done video "The innocence of Muslims", however we may or may not dislike them, we must protect them as if our lives depended upon it.

I call on free newspapers throughout the world to print images of the so called "Prophet" every day until we have 1 day without Muslim violence.

Girls with Guns

AARP throws senior citizens to the wolves in the name of profits.

AARP makes only about 20% of its revenue from membership dues, while it makes 34% of its profits from its healthcare insurance business. AARP's percentage of healthcare insurance profits is about to increase dramatically under Obamacare due to it's lobbying against its own memberships interests.

The AARP has carved out some nice loopholes for itself in order to increase profits from seniors. By suppressing reforms that would have lowered seniors premiums by $415.00 per year, AARP gets to increase its profits. AARP also lobbied to keep its own administrative costs exempt from new rules to lower them. This increases profits to AARP and increases costs to seniors.

Because the majority of AARP's revenue depends on insurance profits from senior citizens, it cannot function as an advocacy group for senior citizens. This conflict of interest does not serve senior citizens, AARP lobbies in the name of senior citizens against the interests of senior citizens. AARP stands to make billions of dollars in profits on the backs of senior citizens.

What Can You Do?

Switch any insurance you may have away from AARP. Do not renew your membership with AARP. There are many other senior advocacy groups that are actual advocates for seniors, find one that suits your needs. The fastest growing senior advocacy group is American Seniors Association at: http://www.americanseniors.org/ .

Girls With Guns