90 Miles From Tyranny

infinite scrolling

Monday, March 26, 2018

#FreeDankula: A Rant




Didn't You Get The Memo? (A Rant)

Girls With Guns

Blogs With Rule 5 Links



These Blogs Provide Links To Rule 5 Sites:

The Other McCain has: Rule 5 Sunday: Nikki Nicole
Proof Positive has: Best Of Web Link Around
The Woodsterman has: Rule 5 Woodsterman Style
The Right Way has: Rule 5 Saturday LinkORama
The Pirate's Cove has: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup

Does It Take An Olympian To Understand The Constitution?


The Media And "Feminists" Are Not Pro-Woman...


Banana docks, New York, ca. 1890-1910 - Colorized

More Great Photos:

Thanksgiving 1919

Hot dog stand - Chicago 1962

Facebook, Was It Worth It?



Mark Zuckerberg Attempts To Eat Like A Human...

Immigration Hypocrisy On The Left Would Be Comical, If It Wasn't So Dangerous...




Merkel regime to suspend anti-migrant parents’ rights?

Merkel’s regime could punish criticism of the German asylum policy by refusing parents access to their own children.

Those who post “xenophobic” statements on Facebook or demonstrate against “refugee homes” could soon lose the right of contact with their children, even if no criminal offence was ever committed, according to the German Bar Association.

A staff member of the Deutscher Anwaltsverein [German Lawyers’ Association] alerted readers to the left-wing milieu’s latest ploy. The magazine Deutsche Anwaltsauskunft reported that a “xenophobic” posting on Facebook or participation in a demonstration against a migrant shelter may eventually lead to the loss of your right to have contact with your own child.

This could happen even if there was no offense committed, the German Bar Association explained. A member of the lawyer’s association stated in an article published in the magazine that the “discussion about receiving and housing refugees has brought to light some pleasant but also shocking sides of the Germans: more and more people are publicly speaking out, and being openly xenophobic or even protesting against refugee homes”.

These “people have the freedom to enjoy Facebook and real friendships, but also their jobs”, the magazine laments and suggests punishing such individuals: Their custody rights could be at risk.

And this “should be of interest above all to mothers and fathers who educate their child together with a xenophobic ex-partner,” the magazine says, as the child gets into “wrong circles” or the “wrong values” through the “xenophobic” parent.

According to the article, is irrelevant whether the parent makes himself or herself legally punishable by statements or actions. The right of access should serve the well-being of the child, and the parents have a duty of being well-behaved according to article 1684 paragraph 2.

The chairman of the Association of Family Law in the German Bar Association (DAV), Eva Becker, pointed out: “Anyone who once said that he would prefer that there be no Syrian refugees in his neighbourhood, affects the welfare of the child.” The father or a mother openly presents a threat to refugees and to...

LOOK AT ME! I Make Your Gun Laws Now...

#tidepodkids


We Know That The Left Wants To Ban All Guns, That Is Why We Cannot Accept ANY Incrementalism. Not One Ban, Not One Tax, Not One Inconvenience For Law Abiding Citizens. 

SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.

Is Trump Using Omnibus Bill To Now FULLY FUND The Border Wall? It Sure Looks That Way.

Whispers are now rampant that President Trump is using the significant funds allocated to military spending in the most recent omnibus bill he signed last week to allocate full and immediate funding for the southern border wall project. If so it would be a brilliant side-step maneuver that would outflank the anti-secure border members of Congress – including many among the Republican leadership. 


An omnibus bill is not a budget and so allows a president considerable powers to spend those funds as they choose. If this now plays out as some are suggesting, Donald Trump just beat Congress at its own game in getting the funding he and his millions of supporters have long called for to help secure the border. It would be a truly MAGA Art of...

‘I went through hell’ under McCabe: Fmr female FBI agent is loving Karma and telling why

Andrew McCabe isn’t getting the last word.

Robyn Gritz, a former FBI counter-terrorism agent, reacted to McCabe’s scathing op-ed regarding his firing by claiming the former FBI deputy director “slandered” her and made her go “through hell” over a harassment claim she filed against a superior.
Gritz told Fox & Friends Pete Hegseth she began working with McCabe in 2005. At the time, she was a “detailee” to the CIA and her boss (who was not McCabe) began “scrutinizing [her] work” and alleging she was “fragile” following her divorce.

“He made some discriminatory comments about why I was traveling and such,” Gritz said of her supervisor and another coworker.

“At the same time, they were doing similar talks like this to an African American detailee that worked with me,” she added.

Gritz claimed she “put [her] foot down” and addressed the issue with her supervisor, who threatened her job. In response, she filed a harassment complaint against him.

According to Gritz, McCabe signed off on an internal investigation of Gritz just five days later. In the sworn statement to the FBI’s Office of Personal Responsibility, McCabe wrote that he “knew” Gritz had or was going to file a complaint about her boss.

“Basically, I went through hell for a year and a half, and Andy made sure that I couldn’t get out of the division. I was selected for certain jobs, and he actually slandered me, went into the meeting at headquarters and said really nasty...

Morning Mistress