90 Miles From Tyranny

infinite scrolling

Friday, June 22, 2018

The IG Report Is Historical

The recently released IG Report heavily criticising the actions of former FBI Director James Comey and lead FBI investigative agent Peter Strzok’s handling of the Hillary private server scandal as well as alledged Russian collusion but concluding that there was no evidence of bias in the final decision, is the equivalent of the IG completing a report on Chef Bobby Flay’s book, “From My Kitchen to Your Table” and finding no evidence of any recipes. Reasonable Americans across the country rightfully have found the IG’s report to be thorough on evidentiary content but ridiculous regarding conclusion.

Nevertheless, the IG’s report is historical and monumental for several reasons. For starters, the report uncovers the reality of a deep state, where high ranking government officials used their power and operated outside department rules and regulations as well as the law to disqualify a legitimately elected U.S. President. Whereas before the report’s release, one could argue that the belief in a deep state was the stuff reserved for tin foil hat wearing quacks, now to deny the existence of the deep state is to deny reality.

The second gift of the IG’s report exposes the reality of a conspiracy. In the report, when FBI lawyer Lisa Page asked FBI agent Strzok if Trump would be President, Strzok replied, “No he won’t. We’ll stop it.” The key word is “we” which includes a high ranking official in the person of Strzok and points to one or more persons working with him in stopping Trump which is the definition of a conspiracy.

Again, before the report’s release, just mentioning the term conspiracy could force a person to lose credibility. Now, with the hard evidence showing that two senior FBI agents, instrumental in the investigations, communicated their need to take down a President, makes a claim legitimate.

It was Trey Gowdy, as chairman of the Benghazi Committee, who uncovered Clinton’s use of a private email server, not the fourth estate.

It was Republicans working on congressional committees that uncovered inconsistencies regarding the FBI’s probe of Hillary Clinton’s email server, not the fourth estate. And although not part of the Hillary server scandal, it was not the fourth estate but instead The House Intelligence Committee that exposed the Steele discredited dossier that was central to...

MEDIA BLACKOUT: MIAMI SERIAL KILLER TURNS OUT TO BE AN ILLEGAL ALIEN


MIAMI, FL (The Miami Herald) – A Honduran national in the United States illegally has been charged with killing two women in Miami over the past three months and dumping their bodies on the street, police announced Monday.

Juan Carlos Hernandez-Caseres, 37, was arrested Saturday morning for the murders of Ann Farrin, 41, and Neidy Roche, 39. Both women, police said, were prostitutes.

Farrin’s body was found by paramedics Wednesday morning in the 3000 block of Northwest 25th Avenue, between Northwest 38th Street and Northwest 37th Street. Hernandez-Caseres told police he had picked Farrin up in his car for the purpose of paying her for sex, but sometime during intercourse, he became “enraged” and punched her in the throat and neck.

Surveillance footage taken at the time shows a black vehicle coming to a stop between Northwest 38th Street and Northwest 37th Street. The driver gets out, removes a body from the passenger side and leaves it on the sidewalk.

Roche’s body was found three months ago, on March 2, near the corner of Northwest 30th Avenue and Northwest 26th Street. She suffered head trauma and was lying on the side of the road.

Following Farrin’s death, police noticed similarities in the cases. They used DNA evidence and other leads to determine Hernandez-Caseres was the killer.

An arrest warrant issued to Miami-Dade police into the death of...

Morning Mistress

The 90 Miles Mystery Box: Episode #295


You have come across a mystery box. But what is inside? 
It could be literally anything from the serene to the horrific, 
from the beautiful to the repugnant, 
from the mysterious to the familiar.

If you decide to open it, you could be disappointed, 
you could be inspired, you could be appalled. 

This is not for the faint of heart or the easily offended. 
You have been warned.

Hot Pick Of The Late Night

What Kendrick Lamar reveals about the n-word


Thursday, June 21, 2018

Girls With Guns

Sarah Sanders On The Hate America First Democrats...


Sarah Sanders Goes Scorched Earth On Reporter For Trying To Blame Trump For School Shooting [VIDEO]

Peter Fonda Wants A New Protege


































With All The Rape And Pedophilia In Hollywood...

When You Hear Hollywood Leftists Complaining About Trump...


LOCK THEM BOTH UP..


What Is Going On In The UK?


In The United Kingdom, The Truth Will IMPRISON YOU.

UK: Descent into POLICE STATE

The Tommy Robinson Interview That Got Brittany Pettibone Banned From The U.K.

How Immigration Officials Cooked the Books and Fooled Congress for Years

A recent Justice Department report on U.S. immigration courts provides a rare glimpse into the difficulties faced by the Trump administration as it repairs the damages inflicted on these tribunals over the last 20 years.

But give credit to the courts’ new executive, James McHenry. Early on, he identified the need for transparency and has made accurate disclosure of court business one of his agency’s highest priorities. Candor, if not reform, demands no less.

It’s a good start for an executive whose predecessors often avoided—and sometimes denied—the truth about the courts’ troubling dynamics. Yet the courts limped along, their annual reports masking a systemic dysfunction never shared with Congress.

While transparency won’t cure the dysfunction, it should identify obvious areas for reform—among them failures to appear in court.

From 1996 through 2016, just under half of all aliens who were set free pending a trial date—1.25 million in total—were ordered removed, i.e. deported. Of that number, 952,291 were removed for evading court. Less than a quarter of this same group actually appeared in court. Over the span of more than two decades of court business, nearly two-fifths (37 percent) of those who were let free before their trial ended up fleeing court.

Since 1996, an average of 45,000 migrants each year disappeared, adding to a backlog of unexecuted removal orders that in 2016 numbered 954,000. If predictions are correct, nearly 57,000 people will evade their hearings in 2018 and bring the 23-year failure-to-appear total to 1.05 million—that’s 9.3 percent of the illegal population in the U.S. as measured by a 2017 Pew Research Center study.

It is here that damage to the courts, immigration enforcement, and national security intersect.

From 2001 through 2005, Immigration and Customs Enforcement freed 45,000 out of nearly 92,000 people who entered the U.S. from terror-linked nations. Released to pursue asylum claims, Department of Homeland Security officials believed many would disappear—and they were right.

Out of 641,000 immigration court decisions handed down over the same period, 43 percent of them—or 279,000 verdicts—directed those who missed their hearings to be removed. Court records reveal that aliens detained and then released to attend court fled their hearings at roughly the same rate as their counterparts who were never detained.

Unsurprisingly, Homeland Security found that 85 percent of those ordered removed later absconded. In other words, when confronted with deportation, they ran. Seldom, according to ICE records, were any ever rearrested.

How did their flight from court escape notice? How did the practice continue for so long without a reckoning?

The answer lies in mismanagement across both Republican and Democratic administrations that produced weak—and sometimes dishonest—recaps of court business. In essence....