Top officials at a U.S. federal cybersecurity agency are urging a judge not to authorize at this time the release of a report that analyzes Dominion Voting Systems equipment in Georgia, arguing doing so could assist hackers trying to “undermine election security.”
Jen Easterly, the director of Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, answers questions during her confirmation hearing in Washington on June 10, 2021. (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)
The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) was recently provided an unredacted copy of the report, which was prepared by J. Alex Halderman, director of the University of Michigan Center for Computer Security and Society.
The report discusses “potential vulnerabilities in Dominion ImageCast X ballot marking devices,” or electronic voting devices, according to the government.
While CISA supports public disclosure of any vulnerabilities and associated mitigation measures with election equipment, allowing the release of the report at this point “increases the risk that malicious actors may be able to exploit any vulnerabilities and threaten election security,” government lawyers said in a Feb. 10 filing in the case.
The case was brought in 2017 by good-government groups and voters who say the lack of paper ballots undermines the voting process.
U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg, an Obama nominee overseeing the case, was urged by CISA to reject attempts to release a redacted version of Halderman’s report for now.
CISA officials want to review the information in the report and help Dominion resolve the vulnerabilities identified before the report is released. They said they weren’t able to provide a date by which they’ll be finished.
Totenberg must weigh the request against the wishes of Georgia Secretary State Brad Raffensperger, a Republican and one of the defendants, who called in late January for the release to happen immediately.
John Poulos, Dominion’s CEO and president, said in a statement released by Raffensperger’s office that Halderman’s review lacked “a holistic approach,” adding that Dominion “supports all efforts to bring real facts and evidence forward to defend the integrity of our machines and the credibility of...
Read More HERE
6 comments:
"Vulnerabilities"? How could there be vulnerabilities? We've been assured that there *certainly* weren't any in the 2020 election because Dominion was utterly trustworthy! Most Secure Election Ever!
Why one might almost think that this report amounts to an admission that there *are* vulnerabilities, and that 2020 might not've been as secure as we've been assured...
The left media was all over how the machines could be hacked prior to the election. It was only after the election that they became "the most secure ever".
Biden administration fights to cover-up their massive election fraud. It can't be anything else.
I can't wait till we get to hunt you down, all those involved with this BS. You will be tried, convicted and sent to the gallows. You bitches are going to swing!!!!
By the looks of this, everyone at Dominion needs to be hanged with the entrails of the Democrat party leadership.
Democrats control the House, Senate, Presidency and all Federal agencies Notably the DOJ, FBI, CIA, DHS.
Nothing will happen to those connected with voting fraud and corruption.
The deep state covers their own.
The two tiered system of Justice is alive and well.
Post a Comment