1619 Project founder complains that study proving liberal intolerance is being used to 'bolster claims of liberal intolerance'

"The problem [of] this survey is how it’s being used to bolster claims of liberal intolerance," Hannah-Jones opined.

Nikole Hannah-Jones of The New York Times questioned the data brought forward by the free speech group FIRE because it validates the concerns about self-censorship that white people have, in addition to minorities.


"But the problem this survey is how it's being used to bolster claims of liberal intolerance," Hannah-Jones claims.

To decode what Hannah-Jones is trying to say: she seems to believe white people and minorities can’t both have this problem mutually. To her it’s one or the other.

The reality of what the fire blog post points out is that students in the "white," "black," "hispanic," and "Asian" blocs experience LESS feelings of self-censorship from their multiracial and American Indian counterparts.
FIRE's analysis of the data reads: "According to the survey, one in five [b]lack students report self-censoring 'fairly' or 'very' often, as do almost one in give Hispanic (18%) and Asian (17%) students. These percentages are higher for multiracial students (22%), American Indian students (25%), and students who identified their race/ethnicity as 'Something else' (32%). when it came to sexuality, students identifying as heterosexual/straight or as 'something else' self-censored most often."...



Read More HERE