The San Francisco police department at some point decided it would be a brilliant idea to employ robots with deadly force in their department, causing quite a stir.
However, since the news broke, the SFPD has clarified that the robots would not carry guns.
Just bombs.
From SFGate:
"The SFPD does not own or operate robots outfitted with lethal force options and the Department has no plans to outfit robots with any type of firearm," spokesperson Allison Maxie said in a statement. "As an intermediate force option, robots could potentially be equipped with explosive charges to breach fortified structures containing violent, armed, or dangerous subjects or used to contact, incapacitate, or disorient violent, armed, or dangerous suspect who pose a risk of loss of life to law enforcement or other first responders by use of any other method, approach, or contact."They aren't going to shoot people with robots. They're just going to use the robots as suicide bombers to take out bad guys.
Maxie added, "While an explosive charge may be considered an intermediate force option, it could potentially cause injury or be lethal. Robots equipped in this manner would only be used in extreme circumstances to save or prevent further loss of innocent lives."
That's what the police are saying, but there are, of course, opponents to this plan.
The policy has faced strong criticism ahead of the Tuesday vote.
"We are living in a dystopian future, where we debate whether the police may use robots to execute citizens without a trial, jury, or judge," Tifanei Moyer of Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area told Mission Local.These robots, like any use of deadly force, should...
"We have to ask ourselves do we want to be in a society where police kill people with robots? It feels so deeply dehumanizing and militaristic," Ryan Calo, a University of Washington law and information science professor, told NPR.
Read More HERE
No comments:
Post a Comment