Ninety miles from the South Eastern tip of the United States, Liberty has no stead. In order for Liberty to exist and thrive, Tyranny must be identified, recognized, confronted and extinguished.
infinite scrolling
Friday, September 10, 2021
CDC unveils Orwellian terminology change: “Vaccinated” will no longer include the term “immunity”
(Natural News) Long-time readers know we aren’t big fans of vaccines here, but that said, the reason they were developed in the first place was to provide people with an immunity from whatever disease the vaccine was intended to address and treat.
That’s not speculation and it’s not a conspiracy theory: Vaccines for polio, chicken pox, measles, mumps, rubella, anthrax, and so on are all intended to make people immune to the disease.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention knows this, of course, and even used to recognize that fact. We say ‘used to’ because the nation’s foremost ‘health’ agency is now changing that stance — that fact — after decades, and because the agency has become little more than just another politicized wing of our big fat centralized government.
And of course, it’s all due to COVID-19, the virus that the left has used as an excuse to change everything from how we function in society to our religious practices and how our economy functions (or doesn’t function).
According to Big League Politics:
On September 1st, 2021 the United States Center for Disease Control (CDC) updated its website’s definition of the word “vaccination,” replacing the word “immunity” with “protection.”
“Vaccination: The act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease.” — Prior to Sept. 1.
“Vaccination: The act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce protection from a specific disease.” — After Sept. 1.
“The change in definition was noticed by Americans around the country with many posting screenshots of the definition before and after the change online,” Big League Politics added.
Social media users took to various online platforms to voice their outrage and disgust with this completely unnecessary (if medical science involving vaccines really has been right all these years) change.
“We’re living in 1984.” conservative political commentator Kangmin Lee noted on Instagram. “They keep shifting the goalpost, lying to us, and redefining terms. They did this with herd immunity, anti-vax, and now the definition of vaccination itself from immunity to ‘protection’, which is such a broad, vague term. And of course, this is all by design. Wake up America.”
“Stop trusting these public health bureaucrats,” Lee added.
Added Big League Politics:
Suspicions of American institutions like the CDC are at an all-time high, especially with reports of waning vaccine efficacy like Israel’s report on Pfziers vaccine being only 39% effective against certain variants.
Mind you, even the flu vaccine has been justified each and every year despite its dismal success rate as being necessary to create “immunity” among the population (though as with COVID-19, if you get the flu and recover, your natural immunity is a lot stronger than any vaccine ever could be).
This comes as the COVID pandemic‘s biggest liar, Dr. Anthony Fauci, is being called out by a leading U.S. senator for covering up his involvement and contributions in creating the disease to begin with.
“You know, for 18 months, he’s been saddling up his moral high horse and clucking his tongue at college kids who want to go celebrate a football game in an outdoor stadium on a nice fall day or parents who don’t want their kindergartners to have to wear masks their entire lives, telling you you have to wear three masks, when all along...
National Archives Slaps ‘Harmful Content’ Warning On Constitution, All Other Founding Documents
The National Archives Records Administration placed a “harmful content” warning on the Constitution, labeling the governing document of the United States as “harmful or difficult to view.” The warning applies to all documents across the Archives’ cataloged website, including the Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence.
“NARA’s records span the history of the United States, and it is our charge to preserve and make available these historical records,” the administration said in a statement. “As a result, some of the materials presented here may reflect outdated, biased, offensive, and possibly violent views and opinions. In addition, some of the materials may relate to violent or graphic events and are preserved for their historical significance.”
The NARA, which is responsible for preserving and protecting documentation of American heritage, noted that so-called harmful historical documents could “reflect racist, sexist, ableist, misogynistic/misogynoir, and xenophobic opinions and attitudes; be discriminatory towards or exclude diverse views on sexuality, gender, religion, and more,” and “include graphic content of historical events such as violent death, medical procedures, crime, wars/terrorist acts, natural disasters and more.”
Along with committing to diversity and equity, the NARA said it would “[work] in conjunction with diverse communities, [and] seek to balance the preservation of this history with sensitivity to how these materials are presented to and perceived by users.”
This isn’t the first time the National Archives has catered to a leftist view of history. In June, the National Archives’ racism task force claimed that the Archives’ rotunda, which houses founding documents, is an example of “structural racism.” The task force also pushed to include trigger warnings around displays of the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and...
Quick Hits Of Wisdom, Knowledge And Snark #12 - Totalitarian Jab Edition...
Biden Administration is proposing requiring banks to report virtually all their customers’ bank account information and activity to the IRS regardless of the customers’ consent
Consumer Alert
Washington proposes new bank reporting of all personal and business financial account info to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Let Congress know your privacy matters.
Contact Congress Now
Policymakers in Washington have proposed requiring banks to report virtually all their customers’ bank account information and activity to the IRS regardless of the customers’ consent.
While community banks do not endorse such broad IRS access to their customers’ account information, consumers need to be aware of the potential effects of this proposal.
Mandating new, broad bank account reporting to the IRS would infringe on the privacy of bank customers, push more people away from a banking relationship and overload the IRS with more personal information about American citizens than it can possibly process or keep safe from a data hack.
To be heard in Washington before this bank IRS reporting regime is enacted, you can send the following customizable message directly to your members of Congress and ensure your voice is heard.
Consumers Express
Opposition
Morning Consult-ICBA polling found:
67% of voters oppose IRS proposal
64% don’t trust IRS to monitor financial info
54% don’t trust IRS to keep financial data safe
Resources to Help Fight Back
Talking Points
Consumer Advocates Say
Consumer groups are speaking out against the broad, untargeted nature of the bank IRS reporting regime proposal.
"In practice, the IRS’s task would be daunting and, in fact, bury the agency in a sea of unproductive information."
-Steven Rosenthal of the Urban Institute and Brookings Institution’s Tax Policy Center
"They are collecting information about everybody, and I don’t know why it is necessary to collect information about everybody."
Knives taken off supermarket shelves in New Zealand after terrorist attack
A general manager of supermarket chain Countdown said it was also considering if they would sell such items in the future.
"Last night, we made the decision to temporarily remove all knives and scissors from our shelves while we consider whether we should continue to sell them," Kiri Hannifin, Countdown’s general manager for safety, said in a statement on Saturday.
"This is in no way a reflection on our customers, but an act of support for our team. We want all of our team to feel safe when they come to work, especially considering the events of yesterday," Hannifin said.
Reuters noted, citing local reports, that sharp knives had been taken off shelves at other supermarkets too.
On Friday, a Sri Lankan national who was previously known to security forces in New Zealand entered a Countdown supermarket, going after several customers and stabbing them, witnesses said.
New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern noted that the attacker “was a supporter of ISIS ideology.”
Officials said Friday that six people were injured from the attack, with three transported to the hospital in critical condition. One person was in serious condition, and two others were in moderate condition.
The man, who has not yet been identified, was shot and killed within a minute of the attack occurring, Ardern said. She said he was a "violent extremist" and called the incident a "terrorist attack."
“It was carried out by an individual — not a faith, not a culture, not an ethnicity, but an individual person who is gripped by ideology that is not supported here by anyone or any community. He alone carries the responsibility for these acts; let that be where the judgment...
The rising biomedical security state is determined to use Covid to reduce every human being to a QR code
Without fanfare and with hardly a peep from the corporate-owned establishment media, the United Nations World Health Organization, also known as the WHO, issued a document last week that should set off alarm bells for lovers of freedom and liberty everywhere.
The document provides “guidance” for every nation in the world on how to go about implementing digital health passports, which is something Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab and other power elites have said since last year would be absolutely essential to conquering the Covid pandemic.
The title alone of the document appears designed to repel the average reader and lull them to sleep: Digital documentation of COVID-19 certificates: vaccination status: technical specifications and implementation guidance.
The WHO is working with the U.S. Centers for Disease Control, or CDC, “to produce a high-value standard for international adoption and technical information exchange.” In layman’s terms, we’re talking about a digital health passport. These passports, as we’ve covered in depth in previous articles, are meant for no other purpose than to track and trace the movement of people in real time, scooping up data all along the way.
In other words, one of the most basic rights in any free society, the freedom of movement, will be shattered if your city, state or nation follows the advice of the WHO, the World Economic Forum, or any of its tech partners such as Microsoft, IBM, Google, Facebook, etc.
The WHO paper states its purpose is to provide standards and specs for the governments and contractors seeking to impose digital vaccine passports on global populations: