Ninety miles from the South Eastern tip of the United States, Liberty has no stead. In order for Liberty to exist and thrive, Tyranny must be identified, recognized, confronted and extinguished.
infinite scrolling
Thursday, May 15, 2014
Wednesday, May 14, 2014
There Is A Place For People Who Use Their Office To Target Political Opponents....
We HAVE to put this criminal in jail to show the other liars, oppressors and thieves in Washington that they need to stop, that they have already gone way too far.
There Is A Reason Why We All Hate The Weather Man - Weather Is Very Unpredictable...
Let's not allow progressives to scare us into further increasing the size of government and further diminishing our liberties.
The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he who, in the name of charity and good will, shepherds the weak through the valley of darkness, for he is truly his brother's keeper and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers. And you will know my name is the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon thee
90 Miles Link Policy
My linking policy is pretty simple.
If you are right of center, not a horrible person, and you link to me, I will link to you. Let me know you linked me and I will add you. If you remove me, I remove you. Simple.
The name of this blog is:
90 Miles From Tyranny
I think it is important for right thinking blogs to promote and help each other. We already suffer plenty of discrimination in the media for not being extreme left wingers. Linking helps promote liberty, generates traffic and improves our search engine rankings so we can better compete against leftist media hegemony.
If you are right of center, not a horrible person, and you link to me, I will link to you. Let me know you linked me and I will add you. If you remove me, I remove you. Simple.
The name of this blog is:
90 Miles From Tyranny
I think it is important for right thinking blogs to promote and help each other. We already suffer plenty of discrimination in the media for not being extreme left wingers. Linking helps promote liberty, generates traffic and improves our search engine rankings so we can better compete against leftist media hegemony.
COMMON FALLACIES IN REASONING
2. SWEEPING GENERALIZATION: (dicto simpliciter) assumes that what is true of the whole will also be true of the part, or that what is true in most instances will be true in all instances.example: A black cat crossed Babbs' path yesterday and, sure enough, she was involved in an automobile accident later that same afternoon. example: Muffin must be rich or have rich parents, because she belongs to ZXQ, and ZXQ is the richest sorority on campus. 3. HASTY GENERALIZATION: bases an inference on too small a sample, or on an unrepresentative sample. Often, a single example or instance is used as the basis for a broader generalization.example: I'd like to hire you, but you're an ex-felon and statistics show that 80% of ex-felons recidivate. 4. FAULTY ANALOGY: (can be literal or figurative) assumes that because two things, events, or situations are alike in some known respects, that they are alike in other unknown respects.example: All of those movie stars are really rude. I asked Kevin Costner for his autograph in a restaurant in Westwood the other evening, and he told me to get lost. 5. APPEAL TO IGNORANCE: (argumentum ad ignorantiam) attempts to use an opponent's inability to disprove a conclusion as proof of the validity of the conclusion, i.e. "You can't prove I'm wrong, so I must be right."example: What's the big deal about the early pioneers killing a few Indians in order to settle the West? After all, you can't make an omelette without breaking a few eggs. 6. BIFURCATION: (either-or, black or white, all or nothing fallacy) assumes that two categories are mutually exclusive and exhaustive, that is, something is either a member of one or the other, but not both or some third category.example: We can safely conclude that there is 7. FALSE DILEMMA: (a form of bifurcation) implies that one of two outcomes is inevitable, and both have negative consequences.example: Either you favor a strong national defense, or you favor allowing other nations to dictate our foreign policy. 8. FAULTY SIGN: (also includes argument from circumstance) wrongly assumes that one event or phenomenon is a reliable indicator or predictor of another event or phenomenon.example: Either you buy a large car and watch it guzzle away your paycheck, or you buy a small car and take a greater risk of being injured or killed in the event of an accident. 9. DAMNING THE SOURCE: (ad hominem, sometimes called the genetic fallacy) attempts to refute an argument by indicting the source of the argument, rather than the substance of the argument itself.example: the cars driving in the opposite direction have their lights on; they must be part of a funeral procession. 10. TU QUOQUE: (look who's talking or two wrongs make a right) pointing to a similar wrong or error committed by another.example: There is no reason to listen to the arguments of those who oppose school prayer, for they are the arguments of atheists! 11. EQUIVOCATION: allows a key word or term in an argument to shift its meaning during the course of the argument. The result is that the conclusion of the argument is not concerned with the same thing as the premise(s).example: Gee, Mom and Dad, how can you tell me not to do drugs when you both smoke cigarettes and drink alcohol? 12. BEGGING THE QUESTION: (petitio principii) entails making an argument, the conclusion of which is based on an unstated or unproven assumption. In question form, this fallacy is known as a COMPLEX QUESTION.example: Only man is rational. No woman is a man. Therefore, no woman is rational. 13. TAUTOLOGY: (a sub-category of circular argument) defining terms or qualifying an argument in such a way that it would be impossible to disprove the argument. Often, the rationale for the argument is merely a restatement of the conclusion in different words.example: Abortion is murder, since killing a baby is an act of murder. 14. APPEAL TO AUTHORITY: (ipse dixit also called ad verecundiam sometimes) attempts to justify an argument by citing a highly admired or well-known (but not necessarily qualified) figure who supports the conclusion being offered.example: The Bible is the word of God. We know this because the Bible itself tells us so. 15. APPEAL TO TRADITION: (don't rock the boat or ad verecundiam) based on the principle of "letting sleeping dogs lie". We should continue to do things as they have been done in the past. We shouldn't challenge time-honored customs or traditions.example: If it's good enough for (insert celebrity's name here), it's good enough for me. 16. APPEAL TO THE CROWD: (ad populum or playing to the gallery) refers to popular opinion or majority sentiment in order to provide support for a claim. Often the "common man" or "common sense" provides the basis for the claim.example: Of course we have to play "pomp and circumstance" at graduation, because that's always been the song that is played. 17. STRAW MAN: stating an opponent's argument in an extreme or exaggerated form, or attacking a weaker, irrelevant portion of an opponent's argument.example: all I can say is that if living together is immoral, then I have plenty of company. 18. SLIPPERY SLOPE: (sometimes called a snowball argument or domino theory) suggests that if one step or action is taken it will invariably lead to similar steps or actions, the end results of which are negative or undesirable. A slippery slope always assume a chain reaction of cause-effect events which result in some eventual dire outcome.example: A mandatory seat belt law could never be enforced. You can't issue citations to dead people. 19. APPEALING TO EXTREMES: A fallacy very similar to slippery slope, which involves taking an argumentative claim or assertion to its extreme, even though the arguer does not advocate the extreme interpretation. The difference between the two fallacies is that appealing to extremes does not necessarily involve a sequence of causal connections.example: If the Supreme Court allows abortion, next think you know they'll allow euthanasia, and it won't be long before society disposes of all those persons whom it deems unwanted or undesirable. 20. HYPOTHESIS CONTRARY TO FACT: This fallacy consists of offering a poorly supported claim about what might have happened in the past or future if circumstances or conditions were other than they actually were or are. The fallacy also involves treating hypothetical situations as if they were fact.example: Husband to ex-wife: Well, if you want to be completely fair about dividing everything up, you should get one of my testicles and I should get one of your breasts! 21. NON SEQUITAR: (literally means "does not follow") in a general sense any argument which fails to establish a connection between the premises and the conclusion may be called a non-sequitar. In practice, however, the label non-sequitar tends to be reserved for arguments in which irrelevant reasons are offered to support a claim.example: If you had only tasted the stewed snails, I'm sure you would have liked them. 22. RED HERRING: attempting to hide a weakness in an argument by drawing attention away from the real issue. A red herring fallacy is thus a diversionary tactic or an attempt to confuse or fog the issue being debated. The name of the fallacy comes from the days of fox hunting, when a herring was dragged across the trail of a fox in order to throw the dogs off the scent.example: I wore a red shirt when I took the test, so that is probably why I did so well on the test. 23. INCONSISTENCY: advancing an argument that is self-contradictory, or that is based on mutually inconsistent premises.example: accused by his wife of cheating at cards, Ned replies "Nothing I do ever pleases you. I spent all last week repainting the bathroom, and then you said you didn't like the color." Example: A used car salespersons says, "Hey, you can’t trust those other car salesman. They’ll say anything to gt you to buy a car from them." Example: A parent has just read a child the story of Cinderella. The child asks, "If the coach, and the footmen, and the beautiful clothes all turned back into the pumpkin, the mice, and the rags, then how come the glass slipper didn’t change back too?" |
Watch Florida Democrat Rep. Joe Garcia Pick His Ear Wax And Try To Act Like He Is Not Eating It...
And eats it anyway. Another bad decision by a Democrat, and possibly the most disgusting thing a Democrat did in that hour.
Want to see the video? Check It Out HERE
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)