Monday, July 10, 2017
Researchers Have 'Invalidated' EPA's Core Global Warming 'Finding'
The trio has concluded that this data is "not a valid representation of reality," and that as a result, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's 2009 "Endangerment Finding" — essentially that global warming has been occurring and continues to accelerate due to human activity — is, in the study's words, "invalidated." The establishment media's silence has been deafening.
The media non-coverage of the research report — "On the Validity of NOAA, NASA and Hadley CRU Global Average Surface Temperature Data & The Validity of EPA’s CO2 Endangerment Finding" — is consistent with its virtual refusal to acknowledge the existence of many other studies released in 2016 and so far this year which have cast serious doubt on human-caused global warming as supposedly "settled science."
At Breitbart in early June, UK-based writer and longtime climate change skeptic James Delingpole referred readers to a collection of "80 Graphs From 58 Papers Invalidate Claims Of Unprecedented Global-Scale Modern Warming" published this year alone. The person who accumulated that collection, Kenneth Richards, is a "professor of environmental economics and policy and an affiliated professor of law at the IU Maurer School of Law."
Richards' recent post arrived just five months after a December post documenting "60 (2016) Scientific Papers Affirm Today’s Warming Isn’t Global, Unprecedented, Or Remarkable." The pace of climate change-skeptical studies is increasing.
Readers relying solely on the establishment press would be aware of none of this. How many papers by qualified authors need to be published before the "97 percent" consensus on human-caused warming disintegrates? (Answer: It already did years ago, but the press won't admit it.)
Late Wednesday, the Daily Caller finally broke the ice, and...
More than half of Comey’s Trump memos contain classified info, officials say
Disgruntled fired FBI Director James Comeyshould’ve heeded this warning before leaking classified intelligence to the left-wing media in a bid to take down President Donald Trump. All it did was reveal Comey to be a vindictive traitor who should never have been trusted with national security secrets.
In June, Comey told the Senate Intelligence Committee that he had a friend leak his personal memos to the New York Times shortly after being fired by Trump in May. At the time, Comey testified that he leaked the documents to defend his reputation after Trump dissed him on Twitter.
Comey also claimed that the memos he wrote as FBI director detailing his top-secret conversations with the president of the United States did not contain any classified information and were his personal property. Say what?
Officials who have seen the Comey memos say that is patently false, and that more than half the memos contained top-secret, classified information.
Four of the seven memos Comey wrote chronicling his conversations with President Trump contained classified intel, officials told the Hill. The documents were clearly marked by the FBI as containing information classified as both “confidential” and...
This Graphic Proves CNN Is A Cancer Attempting To Destroy America
Why intentionally stoke racial animous?
This is textbook communist tactics.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)