90 Miles From Tyranny

infinite scrolling

Tuesday, December 4, 2018

Hot Pick Of The Late Night

Ocasio-Cortez Turns Party UPSIDE DOWN After What She Did - COMPLETELY OUT-OF-ORDER!


Joe Rogan & Anthony Cumia - The Bizarre and Hilarious Real Origin of The Proud Boys


Monday, December 3, 2018

Shut Up Jay Z


Girls With Guns

Blogs With Rule 5 Links



These Blogs Provide Links To Rule 5 Sites:

The Other McCain has: Rule 5 Sunday: Happy Hanukkah!
Proof Positive has: Best Of Web Link Around
The Woodsterman has: Rule 5 Woodsterman Style
EBL has: Rule 5 And FMJRA
The Right Way has: Rule 5 Saturday LinkORama
The Pirate's Cove has: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup

Time To Do It Like IKE!





Macron’s Riot Problem In France Is Getting Worse, Not Better

Most of the talking heads in international media will tell you that French President Emmanuel Macron is one of the most popular, charismatic leaders in the world. That may very well be true in Brussels, where he remains a big supporter of the European Union. But back home in Paris, the streets are literally going up in flames because people are protesting his new gas tax and an escalating cost of living. This has now been going on for several weeks and one person was killed during the opening days of the protests. Now the body count is up to three and there are hundreds in jail and the riots are only growing.
Paris police say 133 people have been injured and 412 have been arrested during France’s worst urban riot in years.

Police said Sunday that those injured during Saturday’s protest included 23 police officers. They say 378 of the arrested have been put in police custody after the violence that tore apart parts of central Paris.

A protest against rising taxes and the high cost of living turned into a riot in the French capital, as activists wearing yellow jackets torched cars, smashed windows, looted stores and tagged the Arc de Triomphe with multi-colored graffiti.

In case you missed it, all of this mayhem was set off by the gas tax I mentioned above, but the anger around the country has been simmering for a while. The New York Times has a lengthy history of what brought the “yellow vest” protesters out from the countryside and into Paris. Under Macron, many new programs have been put in place to reshape how France does business, but these “reforms” cost a lot of money and many in the middle class can no longer pay their bills with all the new taxes and price increases. Some of the protesters with good jobs claim that there’s no money for food during the last week of the month before their next paycheck arrives.

The gas tax seemed to be the straw that broke the camel’s back. Macron wants to move his country off of fossil fuels and into green energy. Paying for such changes by jacking up the price of gasoline has sparked actual fires in the streets. The reality is that France has unprecedented access to cheaper gasoline, including growing supplies from the United States, so this is a crisis of Macron’s own making.

In a telling bit of irony, the French President wound up having to skip an EU climate meeting to focus on the riots and decide whether or not to declare a state of emergency. He’s still vowing that he “won’t back down” in the face of the riots, but with people telling their stories of empty cupboards and skipped meals, Macron’s public statements are edging closer to “let them eat cake” territory. That strategy didn’t work out very well for...

Hiram Maxim posing with his invention, The Maxim Gun, the world’s first fully automatic machine gun “760 shots per minute” c. 1884



More Interesting Photos:

A Most Loyal Dog: Hachiko before his burial in 1935

One of the oldest photos of the Great Sphinx, from 1880


More Amazing Photos:

BREAKING: Criminal Complaint Filed Against Mueller

A criminal complaint was just filed by Jeremy Corsi against Robert Mueller alleging Mueller sought false testimony, Fox News is reporting:
Conservative author Jerome Corsi on Monday filed a “criminal and ethics complaint” against Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team, accusing investigators of trying to bully him into giving “false testimony” against President Trump.

The complaint, which Corsi had threatened for days, is the latest escalation between Mueller’s team and its investigation targets.

The 78-page document, asserting the existence of a “slow-motion coup against the president,” was filed to a range of top law enforcement officials including Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker, DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz, D.C.’s U.S. Attorney Jessie Liu and the Bar Disciplinary Counsel.

“Dr. Corsi has been criminally threatened and coerced to tell a lie and call it the truth,” the complaint states.

Corsi, who wrote the anti-President Obama book “The Obama Nation” and is connected with political operative Roger Stone, has claimed for the past week that he was being improperly pressured by Mueller’s team to strike a plea deal which he now says he won’t sign.

While we have no idea whether or not this criminal complaint against Mueller will go anywhere or whether or not it’s justified it does seem people are not afraid to fight back any longer.

Here’s the complaint in full:

NO ONE.


63% of Non-Citizen Households Access Welfare Programs Compared to 35% of native households

New "public charge" rules issued by the Trump administration expand the list of programs that are considered welfare, receipt of which may prevent a prospective immigrant from receiving lawful permanent residence (a green card). Analysis by the Center for Immigration Studies of the Census Bureau's Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) shows welfare use by households headed by non-citizens is very high. The desire to reduce these rates among future immigrants is the primary justification for the rule change. Immigrant advocacy groups are right to worry that the high welfare use of non-citizens may impact the ability of some to receive green cards, though the actual impacts of the rules are unclear because they do not include all the benefits non-citizens receive on behalf of their children and many welfare programs are not included in the new rules. As welfare participation varies dramatically by education level, significantly reducing future welfare use rates would require public charge rules that take into consideration education levels and resulting income and likely welfare use.

Of non-citizens in Census Bureau data, roughly half are in the country illegally. Non-citizens also include long-term temporary visitors (e.g. guestworkers and foreign students) and permanent residents who have not naturalized (green card holders). Despite the fact that there are barriers designed to prevent welfare use for all of these non-citizen populations, the data shows that, overall, non-citizen households access the welfare system at high rates, often receiving benefits on behalf of U.S.-born children.


Among the findings:
  • In 2014, 63 percent of households headed by a non-citizen reported that they used at least one welfare program, compared to 35 percent of native-headed households.
  • Welfare use drops to 58 percent for non-citizen households and 30 percent for native households if cash payments from the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) are not counted as welfare. EITC recipients pay no federal income tax. Like other welfare, the EITC is a means-tested, anti-poverty program, but unlike other programs one has to work to receive it.
  • Compared to native households, non-citizen households have much higher use of food programs (45 percent vs. 21 percent for natives) and Medicaid (50 percent vs. 23 percent for natives).
  • Including the EITC, 31 percent of non-citizen-headed households receive cash welfare, compared to 19 percent of native households. If the EITC is not included, then cash receipt by non-citizen households is slightly lower than natives (6 percent vs. 8 percent).
  • While most new legal immigrants (green card holders) are barred from most welfare programs, as are illegal immigrants and temporary visitors, these provisions have only a modest impact on non-citizen household use rates because: 1) most legal immigrants have been in the country long enough to qualify; 2) the bar does not apply to all programs, nor does it always apply to non-citizen children; 3) some states provide welfare to new immigrants on their own; and, most importantly, 4) non-citizens (including illegal immigrants) can receive benefits on behalf of their U.S.-born children who are awarded U.S. citizenship and full welfare eligibility at birth.
The following figures include EITC:
  • No single program explains non-citizens' higher overall welfare use. For example, not counting school lunch and breakfast, welfare use is still 61 percent for non-citizen households compared to 33 percent for natives. Not counting Medicaid, welfare use is 55 percent for immigrants compared to 30 percent for natives.
  • Welfare use tends to be high for both newer arrivals and long-time residents. Of households headed by non-citizens in the United States for fewer than 10 years, 50 percent use one or more welfare programs; for those here more than 10 years, the rate is 70 percent.
  • Welfare receipt by working households is very common. Of non-citizen households receiving welfare, 93 percent have at least one worker, as do 76 percent of native households receiving welfare. In fact, non-citizen households are more likely overall to have a worker than are native households.1
  • The primary reason welfare use is so high among non-citizens is that a much larger share of non-citizens have modest levels of education and, as a result, they often earn low wages and qualify for welfare at higher rates than natives.
  • Of all non-citizen households...