90 Miles From Tyranny

infinite scrolling

Monday, June 10, 2019

Girls With Guns

Blogs With Rule 5 Links


These Blogs Provide Links To Rule 5 Sites:

The Other McCain has: Rule 5 Sunday: Monica Bellucci
Proof Positive has: Best Of Web Link Around
The Woodsterman has: Rule 5 Woodsterman Style
EBL has: Rule 5 And FMJRA
The Right Way has: Rule 5 Saturday LinkORama
The Pirate's Cove has: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup

POTUS - Keeping It Real....


Voter Suppression?


Voter Suppression Is Code For People Who Want To Stuff The Ballots With Fake Votes.

Twitter, ISIS, And Gay Porn...


Twitter Is Evil.

CA Dems Agree to Pay $100 Mil Per Year for Illegal Alien Health Care

California Democrats have reached an agreement to cover the costs for full health care benefits for low-income illegal immigrants, according to Fox News.

The agreement–part of the state’s $213 billion budget– would enable low-income illegal adults between the ages of 19 and 25 to sign up for California’s Medicaid program, Medi-Cal.

The state legislature must approve the agreement and a vote is scheduled for this week.

The plan is estimated to cost the state $98 million a year and be available to approximately 90,000 illegal immigrants.

In order to pay for the latest entitlement, California plans to start taxing people who don’t have health insurance.

In a stance to distance itself from President Trump’s administration, California is set to become the first state in the country to pay for tens of thousands of illegal immigrants to have full health benefits.

The plan would take effect in January 2020, the Sacramento Bee reported.State officials have estimated the benefits would be available to about 90,000 low-income illegal immigrants at a cost of $98 million per year.

“While it’s not all we sought, it will provide a real tangible difference for people, especially for those around and below poverty and for middle income families who don’t get any help under the federal law,” Anthony Wright, executive director of advocacy group Health Access, said. Indeed, a family of four earning as much as six times the federal poverty level -- or more than $150,000 a year -- would be eligible to get....

The Consequences Of Watching CNN


CNN Is The Most Consistent News Network In The Nation...

CNN 1/1024% Truth!

EWWW!!! I Stepped In Shit!



16 Fake News Stories Reporters Have Run Since Trump Won

CNN edits 'Crooked' out of Trump tweet

It Is Not Just CNN That Has Mastered Fake News..

Robert Mueller exploited cellphone GPS to track Trump associates

Blackwater founder Erik Prince arrives for a closed meeting with members of the House Intelligence Committee on Capitol Hill

Robert Mueller says he was able to pinpoint security company executive Erik Prince’s precise location for several hours in January 2017 by matching his mobile phone signal to a cell site near Trump Tower in New York City.

The special counsel’s report discloses the use of this investigative technique, by which police determine a suspect’s location via a cellphone’s GPS signal.

The Prince narrative is one instance in unredacted sections of the report in which Mr. Mueller’s team explicitly discloses cellphone tracking. It raises the question of whether the FBI applied the process to other investigative subjects — a phone’s GPS signal can disclose its exact location within a few feet. One of the first requests the FBI makes when confronting subjects is to ask for their electronic devices.

The fact Mr. Mueller could pinpoint Mr. Prince’s exact whereabouts suggest he used GPS readouts, which prosecutors can subpoena from cellular service providers.

“I got the distinct impression that they had all my electronic communications and they operated with a confidence borne of a complete complement of the communications of everyone else,” Michael Caputo, a former Trump campaign adviser, told The Washington Times.

Mr. Caputo has been a vocal critic of the special counsel’s investigation, which in the end found no Trump-Russia conspiracy.

Trump-Russia’s most infamous “whereabouts” question centers on...

The Consequences Of Voting Democrat...



Why Conservatives Should Take Heart Despite Socialist Upsurge



Socialism is the zombie ideology of our era: It fails everywhere, and yet it keeps rising back from the dead.

Despite embarrassing socialist failures in China, Russia, North Korea, Cuba, and now Venezuela, the true believers march onward. Good intentions are unassailable. The revolution must go on.

Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., arguably has done more than any other living American to market socialism to the next generation. And with Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., following closely in his wake, rest assured we’ll be contending with socialism for years to come.

A recent Gallup survey shows that their message is resonating with more and more Americans.

While 51% say socialism would be bad for America, 43% say it would be good. And notably, among the 18-34-year-old cohort, 58% favor socialism while 37% disfavor it.

Those numbers hang like a dark cloud over America’s future, but they don’t tell the whole story.

Interestingly, according to Gallup, Americans still favor the free market over government in multiple areas, including technological innovation, health care, and even basic things like wages, distribution of wealth, and the economy overall. And the comparison isn’t even close.

By contrast, Americans favor government over free markets when it comes to protecting consumers’ online privacy and environmental protection.


This creates quite a mixed picture, even a contradictory one. As a matter of simple math, there have to be millions of Americans who say they favor some form of socialism, yet favor the free market in general when it comes to certain aspects of their lives.

How can that be?

As it turns out, Americans define “socialism” in quite different ways. Traditionally, socialism has meant government ownership of the means of production—businesses, factories, etc. But today, only 17% of Americans hold that definition, according to Gallup. Meanwhile, 23% equate socialism with vague notions of social equality. Another 23% have no opinion on the matter.

So, the public meaning of “socialism” today is indeterminate, meaning that public opinion toward “socialism” doesn’t tell us very much about people’s policy preferences.

But even if it did tell us a lot, public opinion isn’t the surest predictor of what will...

Carter Page Blows The Lid Off Deep State FBI Informant

In what is further proof the Obama regime’s deep state actors were desperate to infiltrate the 2016 Trump campaign, then-foreign policy adviser Carter Page said deep state intel asset Stefan Halper “intensified” communications with him as the FBI worked to obtain a spy warrant from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court.

In an interview with Fox Business‘ Maria Bartiromo for “Sunday Morning Futures,” Page said that the surveillance warrant activity increased shortly after he and Halper met for the first time at a research institute symposium in Cambridge, England, in July 2016.

Page’s comments follow a court filing Thursday by the Justice Department in which more details were provided regarding that critical period right before Halper allegedly acted on behalf of his FBI handlers to get additional information on POTUS Donald Trump’s future National Security Adviser and retired Army Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, who headed up the Defense Intelligence Agency for a time during the Obama regime.

According to Page, just a few days after a January 2016 phone call from Flynn, then the incoming national security adviser, to Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak that was noted to in the court filing, Russian-born U.K. academic Svetlana Lokhova said Halper suddenly contacted her to gain information on Flynn.

When asked about the timing of all of this, a source familiar with the various events noted that “nothing is a coincidence” when it comes to Stefan Halper, noting further that Kislyak was most likely under U.S. surveillance because he is a Russian official.

Interestingly, Page said he and Halper go back years in terms of knowing each other.

“I had a longstanding relationship with Professor Halper,” Page told Bartiromo. “I always believe in ‘innocent until proven guilty,’ but my conversations with him intensified right in the month before my illegitimate FISA warrant in September 2016, when all these defamatory articles are being placed by the [Democratic National Committee].”

Fox News noted further:
Page has sued the DNC and other actors for defamation related to accusations that he was colluding with Russian agents. The FBI, in its Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) application, flatly called Page “an agent of a foreign power.” Page has not been charged with any wrongdoing despite months of surveillance, and the dossier that the FBI relied upon in its FISA application has largely been discredited as a political document rife with inaccuracies.

In its warrant application, the FBI assured the FISA court on numerous occasions that other sources independently corroborated the dossier’s claims but did not clearly state that the dossier’s author worked for a firm hired by Hillary Clinton’s campaign.

“Professor Halper was being very positive, you know, like a Harriet Tubman figure. He understands sort of the the injustices, or he presented himself as understanding that …… and I sort of trusted him,” Page said.

According to what’s been publicly divulged thus far, the FBI formally opened its counterintelligence probe into the Trump campaign July 31, 2016 — or several days after Page said he first met Halper at the symposium. As the probe into ‘Russiagate’ by Attorney General William Barr and U.S. Attorney John Durham continues, we may eventually learn that the Obama regime actually began its “Spygate” operation much sooner, some have speculated.

As for the FBI’s behavior, House Intelligence Committee Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) has said he believes James Comey’s FBI excluded exculpatory evidence against Page when it filed for the FISA warrants.

“There is exculpatory evidence that we have seen, of classified documents that need to be declassified,” Nunes told Fox News‘ Sean Hannity in August 2018.

When pressed, Nunes added, “In that the Carter Page FISA, when the judges should have been presented with this exculpatory evidence that the FBI and DOJ had.”

Later, during often explosive testimony before the House, fired FBI counterintelligence official Peter Strzok swore he provided no substantive input on the application—he didn’t supply any evidence for it and was not involved in presenting it to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court for approval, according to these sources, noted The Daily Beast’s Betsy Woodruff.

However, documents that were released in July 2018 made clear that Strzok did indeed provide info that was utilized to...

Morning Mistress