90 Miles From Tyranny

infinite scrolling

Tuesday, June 2, 2020

Hot Pick Of The Late Night


Soros Organizer Paying Off Rioters Giving Instructions






My YouTube Channel:

White ANTIFA Terrorists Handing Out Bricks To Black Men




My YouTube Channel:

Monday, June 1, 2020

Rioters Beating Up A White Lady Business Owner Trying To Defend Her Livelihood









My YouTube Channel:

Girls With Guns


When the bullet hits your eye Like a big pizza pie, that's amore...


Protest Or Crime Spree, Here Is Your Official Guide:






We Have To Stop Trump, This Is How We Do It!!


Powerful: Protesters Spell Out 'Love' With Burning Homes And Businesses









MINNEAPOLIS, MN—In a powerful display of their care for love and justice, protesters in Minneapolis burned the word "LOVE" into the city, arranging the inspiring message with homes and businesses set ablaze by their riots.

Heartfelt and moving.

"We just really wanted to show how much we care about love and social justice by burning this community into a powerful reminder of what it's all about," said local protester Jake Hernandez, who had flown in from Portland for the event. "Now, when police and fire helicopters fly over to try to restore order, they'll be inspired by our message of love and harmony."

Upon seeing the heart-wrenching message of unity, police dropped their batons, ripped off their badges, donned bandanas, picked up bricks, and joined the protesters in their rioting and looting. "I don't know how I didn't see the light before," said former police officer, now Antifa chapter leader Bridget Morrison as she lobbed a Molotov cocktail into a minority-owned business. "I'm woke to the cause of love and harmony."

What a powerful message! (this is satire) The protesters were also planning to burn the word "SOCIAL JUSTICE" into predominantly black parts of town but have sadly run out of buildings to burn....

For Democrats It's Fight Or Die....In Prison...



Remember This Odd Video From Loretta Lynch In 2017?


She's Scared And Nervous. She Knows Too Much. She Can Implicate Too Many People...

Why Are Rioters ‘Brave’ but Coronavirus Protesters a Health Hazard?

There’s a double standard in how protesters are treated.

I was reading the New Yorker the other day — as one does when stuck at home — and noticed something new: In certain circumstances, it’s no longer socially unacceptable to gather in large groups.

The author, Jelani Cobb, was providing a serviceable recap of the George Floyd incident, where a police officer in Minneapolis brutally killed a black man by kneeling on his neck. Cobb, who often writes on race relations, framed the incident against the backdrop of several recent incidents where police committed what appear to be racially motivated crimes.

The people who took to the streets in Minneapolis to chant and throw rocks at police cars, Cobb wrote, “braved the pandemic” for their deeply held beliefs.

So far so good. Most New Yorker writers are walking, talking Nexis subscriptions with grad degrees, and can spit out these historical explainers on demand. It was only when Cobb started discussing the protests — which at that point were not all-out riots — that his words began to get slippery.

The people who took to the streets in Minneapolis to chant and throw rocks at police cars, Cobb wrote, “braved the pandemic” for their deeply held beliefs. That phrase struck me as odd, not in the least because I remember reading Cobb saying the opposite only a few weeks prior, on the subject of the Wisconsin primary elections. Here, he criticized the people who gathered in large numbers to vote for the Democratic nominee as a “public-health hazard.”

Now, while voting for a Democratic nominee is likely a health hazard in some way, why is it any more dangerous than protesting a police murder? But maybe that’s the wrong question to be asking. Cobb acknowledges that both circumstances are dangerous because he, like most people, believes that large congregations spread the coronavirus like wildfire. So why is it then, that the people protesting the death of Floyd are brave while the people voting are a hazard?

It’s not just some middlebrow magazine writers who are sustaining this new strain of cognitive dissonance. The double standard is a widespread phenomenon. The crowd sizes at voting booths and anti-shutdown events in the past two months have been criticized by the press and prosecuted by state governments. And yet, the crowds at the most recent round of protests and riots (which, in many cases, are much bigger events) were in large part praised, at least until the looting started.

Consider the evolution of Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, whose stay-at-home orders enraged a vocal population of her state. When protesters gathered in Lansing, Whitmer carped about how their gatherings would spread the virus.

“If discouraging protests is something you could consider doing, I’d really be grateful,” she told Vice President Mike Pence on a phone call in mid-May.

Not so for the protesters with whom Whitmer agrees. While she is still asking for people to social distance and wear masks in public, she has adopted a pro-protest...

NBA star J.R. Smith beats the living daylights out of ANTIFA That Was Vandalizing Cars


It's Such A Satisfying Crunch Sound...