90 Miles From Tyranny

infinite scrolling

Thursday, December 31, 2020

Hot Pick Of The Late Night


Our Future Overlords In Their Benign State.....





This Is Their Celebratory "It Was Sure Fun Subjugating The Human Race Today" Dance...

Who Needs Designer Pandemics...




Wednesday, December 30, 2020

Audio Recording Released of Assange & US State Dept. Lawyer...


Former diplomat to China explains the ‘weaponisation of COVID’ | 60 Minutes Australia


Girls With Guns


Learn To Look For The Easter Eggs The Media Hides From You....


 

The Forest Remembers....



See The Forest Beyond The Trees....
 

We Love Him, We Love Him Not...


 



Anyone who reads DoJ researcher John Lott’s paper and still denies voter fraud is a fool













Is it a bombshell? Technically, no. It's a methodical, comprehensive analysis that logically reveals what tens of millions of Americans already knew: The election was stolen through massive, coordinated voter fraud. This is 100% certain.

Americans have been conned. We are still being conned. This is, in fact, the biggest con-job perpetrated against the masses since WMDs were used as the predicate for permanent Middle East wars. The only reason that con-job was technically bigger is because it fooled more people. This one only seems to be fooling about half of the country. But its effects may end up being even bigger as a corrupt, controlled puppet of the Chinese Communist Party is poised to become the leader of the free world.

An academic analysis and report written by a Department of Justice researcher may be the clearest indication that massive voter fraud took place. It’s not that it presents additional evidence, but instead dives into the numbers in a way that makes it crystal clear voter fraud was the only viable explanation for surges in votes that were isolated to key counties in swing states. What makes his analysis different from others is that it quantifies the likely voter fraud scope in a way that makes clear it was sufficient to change the results of the election. 

According to the abstract of his 25-page report:
This study provides measures of vote fraud in the 2020 presidential election. It first compares Fulton county’s precincts that are adjacent to similar precincts in neighboring counties that had no allegations of fraud to isolate the impact of Fulton county’s vote-counting process (including potential fraud). In measuring the difference in President Trump’s vote share of the absentee ballots for these adjacent precincts, we account for the difference in his vote share of the in-person voting and the difference in registered voters’ demographics. The best estimate shows an unusual 7.81% drop in Trump’s percentage of the absentee ballots for Fulton County alone of 11,350 votes, or over 80% of Biden’s vote lead in Georgia. The same approach is applied to Allegheny County in Pennsylvania for both absentee and provisional ballots. The estimated number of fraudulent votes from those two sources is about 55,270 votes.

Second, vote fraud can increase voter turnout rate. Increased fraud can take many forms: higher rates of filling out absentee ballots for people who hadn’t voted, dead people voting, ineligible people voting, or even payments to legally registered people for their votes. However, the increase might not be as large as the fraud if votes for opposing candidates are either lost, destroyed, or replaced with ballots filled out for the other candidate. The estimates here indicate that there were 70,000 to 79,000 “excess” votes in Georgia and Pennsylvania. Adding Arizona, Michigan, Nevada, and Wisconsin, the total increases to up to 289,000 excess votes.
The data Lott analyzes and subsequently explains is inexplicable without the presence of massive voter fraud. But it’s bigger than that. The coordination between states becomes apparent when we realize the same process that were used in one county were also applied to others. There are differences in the way the cheaters went about their normal business of cheating before and on election night, but the post-election night injections of ballots were uniform. In other words, they cheated stealthily at first but when it was clear they had still lost, they went with the clumsier, more easily noticeable wholesale fraud attempts.

Unfortunately, all of the so-called “arbiters of truth” have declined to cover any of this, just as they’ve covered up the entire process from the start. Mainstream media and Big Tech in particular are complicit in this cover-up to the point that they often do not even try to debunk reports like Lott’s. They simply announce that the election is over and there’s nothing more to be said about it. But the details of Lott’s report are not only worth reading, but definitely worth spreading to the masses. If mainstream media won’t cover it, we will. If Big Tech will try to suppress it, we’ll continue to share anyway.

John Lott is a world-renowned economist and statistician. His work has always been impeccable and this particular research is top notch. There is no feasible way for the left to...

How To Get A Law Passed:


 

Network News Uninterested in California Ruling to Release Sex Offenders, Pedophiles












According to the likes of ABC, CBS, and NBC on Tuesday, the only thing newsworthy coming out of the State of California was their struggle with the coronavirus. But what they tried to keep under the radar was the state’s radical Supreme Court ruling that so-called “nonviolent” sex offenders could not be excluded from the state’s early parole program.

Instead of informing their viewers of California’s disturbing favoritism to sex offenders and pedophiles, the networks continued to boast about President-elect Joe Biden bashing President Trump’s vaccine distribution efforts. They also elevated Biden’s detail-free claim he’ll vaccinate one million Americans a day in his first 100 days in office.

It was a good thing that Fox News Channel’s Special Report was there to shed a light on what the liberal news outlets wanted to cover-up.

The release of such vile people stemmed from ballot proposition 57, which was pushed by former California Governor Jerry Brown (D). Despite Brown’s original promise that sex offenders and pedophiles would not be included in the early parole program, “Voters, experts say, may have been duped,” as reported by Fox News national correspondent William La Jeunesse.

“Now, the state Supreme Court says otherwise. ‘The proposition provides no indication that the voters intended to exclude from parole consideration an inmate’s sex offense when the inmate was convicted of a nonviolent felony,’” La Jeunesse read from the sickening ruling. As he read that, the on-screen headline accurately stated: "California goes soft on sex offenders."

 





















Adding: “Prop 57 was one of several efforts to reduce prison overcrowding. Attorneys say the ruling means up to 20,000 inmates could be released early. Largely because only state law defines violent felonies, Prop 57 did not.”

La Jeunesse included a soundbite of Republican Assemblyman Jim Patterson, who was disgusted by...

If you don't know history, then you don't know anything. You are a leaf that doesn't know it is part of a tree.


 

Michael Crichton Quote In The Title Of An Allen West Quote


More Crichton:

What Intoxicating Vanity



More West:

Allen West On The Left...