90 Miles From Tyranny : New Huma Emails Uncover Clinton State Dept Plan To Bring NYT Reporter David Brooks To Heel

Monday, April 3, 2017

New Huma Emails Uncover Clinton State Dept Plan To Bring NYT Reporter David Brooks To Heel

This simply confirms what we have always already known: The Mainstream Media is the propaganda arm of the Democrat Party.

Story:

Recently released Huma Abedin State Department emails - acquired by Judicial Watch via FOIA request, reveal Clinton State Department staff planning to summon New York Times reporter David Brooks for an "OTR" (off the record) conversation over a "shot" he took at Hillary in a Febuary 2010 article. This isn't the first time we've learned of the Democrat apparatus wrapping their tentacles around the MSM, and it's the second time in weeks Judicial Watch has delivered a bombshell. They're doing good work.

In summary; Hillary Clinton - code named "Evergreen," fired off an email on February 9th, 2010 to advisors Philippe Reines and Jake Sullivan regarding an article written by NYT's David Brooks (links added):

From: Evergreen
To: PIR (Philippe Reines), Jake Sullivan
Subject: David Brooks

"Took a shot at me in his column today. Any ideas what prompted it?"

To which senior advisor Philippe Reines responds:

"Not sure - but this is a good excuse to bring him in for an OTR [off the record] with you. Lona mentioned you wanted to see [NYT Journalist] Tom Friedman - with your ok, we could schedule both (separately) over the next month or so.

I'd very much like to get back in the habit of bringing someone or a small group in every few weeks"

Followed by Jake Sullivan's response:

Phillippe and I had an offline conversation about this and I agree entirely. I think it makes sense for you to meet with influencers on a regular -- though not intrusive -- basis. An OTR conversation with you is the best way to help guys like Brooks 'figure out' how things work.

So a top Clinton advisor wanted to get 'back in the habit' of bringing people or groups in every few weeks? This clearly suggests...

Read More HERE

2 comments:

  1. If Hillary has to bring David Brooks to heel, you know how much trouble she was in. Jeeze Louise, I am pretty sure Brooks voted for Hillary over Trump.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yup, David Brooks is a fake conservative "journalist" that the NYT uses to feign journalistic balance.

      Delete