90 Miles From Tyranny : IT BEGINS: BIDEN REGIME THREATENS MISSOURI AFTER STATE PASSES LAW PROTECTING THE SECOND AMENDMENT

infinite scrolling

Sunday, June 20, 2021

IT BEGINS: BIDEN REGIME THREATENS MISSOURI AFTER STATE PASSES LAW PROTECTING THE SECOND AMENDMENT


The war over the future of our country may actually begin right smack dab in the middle of it.

In Missouri.

Always known as a hard-tack place where good, down-to-earth folk live (and, generally, let live — with the exception of St. Louis and Kansas City), Missourians don’t really bother people too much.

But the courtesy goes both ways: Folks shouldn’t bother them, either.

And yet, the Biden regime wants to bother Missourians. And the rest of the country too — with new gun control laws.

We already see them coming.

In Missouri, though, GOP lawmakers and Gov. Mike Parsons are heading Biden’s gun controllers off at the pass.

They’ve passed a new law that tells the Biden regime where they can do if they believe they’re going to enforce new, unconstitutional gun control laws in the Show-Me State.

Trending Politics reports:

Once again, a Democratic regime is cherry-picking states to force into compliance with the U.S. Constitution while holding aloft the founding document's 'Supremacy Clause.'

Per Civics 101, the clause stems from Article VI, Paragraph 2, which 'establishes that the federal constitution, and federal law generally, take precedence over state laws, and even state constitutions,' Cornell Law School notes in its online 'splainer.

'It prohibits states from interfering with the federal government's exercise of its constitutional powers, and from assuming any functions that are exclusively entrusted to the federal government,' the 'splainer notes further.

This is relevant again because the Biden regime has its dander up over a new measure signed into law on Thursday by Missouri Republican Gov. Mike Parsons. Called the 'Second Amendment Preservation Act,' the measure prevents local police in the Show-Me State from assisting federal agents in enforcing federal firearms laws.

'The Second Amendment Preservation Act is about protecting law-abiding Missourians against government overreach and unconstitutional federal mandates,' Parsons wrote in a letter to the Justice Department.

'We will reject any attempt by the federal government to circumvent the fundamental right Missourians have to keep and bear arms to protect themselves and their property. Throughout my career, I have always stood for the Constitution and our Second Amendment rights, and that will not change today or any day,' he added.

This doesn’t make the regime happy, Fox News adds:

In a letter sent Wednesday night and obtained by The Associated Press, Justice officials said the U.S. Constitution's Supremacy Clause outweighs the measure that Parson signed into law Saturday. The new rules penalize local police departments if their officers enforce federal gun laws.

Boynton said the law threatens to disrupt the...




Read More HERE

7 comments:

Tewshooz said...

The free state of Idaho has passed a law like that, too.

matism said...

The Feds had no problem accepting the sanctuary cities for the illegal alien terrorist invaders!!!

Peteforester said...

Federal law only supersedes state law if the federal law is CONSTITUTIONAL. If it's not, then the federal government has committed an illegal act, and the state can ignore it! ...That goes right down to the personal level, folks... If a law is UNCONSTITUTIONAL, as per reading the CONSTITUTION, not necessarily by judgement of the Supreme Court, then it can and should be ignored. There's no slop in the Second Amendment, folks; no room for "interpretation" or "redefinition." It is what it is.

P n E said...

Let it start in Missouri. Eventually a stand must be taken or live forever in servitude.

Wayne Wilson said...

The fed courts were more then happy to allow cities not to have their police help feds on illegals being arrested. Seems to go all one way .

Gs said...

An Illegitimate president attempting to make unconstitutional laws and forcing them upon a state and it citizens this is where we are at folks

HalfElf said...

So let me understand this
1. Not enforcing federal drug laws is a states rights thing
2. Enforcing federal immigration laws is not a state rights thing
3. Not enforcing federal immigration laws is a state rights thing
4. Setting up immigration and drugs laws Sanctuary zones,cities, counties, and states is a local control item
But push back on gun control and you are the bad guy? What planet does this make sense on?