Thursday, December 9, 2021
South Pole records its coldest six months stretch, as Arctic Sea ice volume expands, nearing 20-year record
The South Pole just recorded its coldest six month stretch since 1976. Arctic Sea ice volume is currently breaking 20-year records. Chunks of ice are interfering with shipping routes in the Siberian Sea. There are signs that the Earth is entering a time of rapid cooling. Indeed, the climate is ever-changing, but the causes and effects propagated by the corporate media couldn’t be further from the truth.
Global warming alarmists have been capitalizing on lies for decades
For decades, global warming alarmists have been lying to the public about rising temperatures and impending “end of the world” scenarios. Back in 2007, U.S. scientists claimed that the arctic would be completely “ice-free” within “5-6 years” and would cause a catastrophic rise in sea level. The report was published by the BBC. At the time, Professor Wieslaw Maslowski from the U.S. Navy, Department of Oceanography said the report was too conservative, and that the poles would be completely “ice-free by the summer of 2013.”
When 2013 came around, the end of the world never came, polar ice remained intact, and the sea did not rise. Coastal communities were safe. But it didn’t take long for a new breed of climate alarmists to take up the mantle of climate doom propaganda. In 2010, Mark Sereezer, the newly appointed senior scientist at the US government’s Snow and Ice Data Center was famously quoted as saying: “the Arctic is screaming.” Today, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) joins a chorus of Democrats who screech that we’re only 10-12 years away from an end of the world climate catastrophe.
Fast forward to 2021, and governments are meeting to discuss ways to prevent a cataclysmic climate catastrophe that just never seems to materialize. Even though the global warming predictions continue to be exposed as hysteria, propaganda and scientific maleficence, governments want to use this narrative as an opportunity to control economies, tax the people, engineer the...
Inflation On My Shoulders Gives Me Sunburn....
Inflation on my shoulders gives me sunburn
Inflation in my eyes can make me blind
Inflation on the water is too expensive
Inflation almost always makes me cry
If I had a day that I could give you
I'd give to you a day without inflation
If I had a song that I could sing for you
I'd sing a song to make you feel fiscally stable
FDA Says It Now Needs 75 Years to Fully Release Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Data
The Food and Drug Administration is asking a judge to give it 75 years to produce data concerning the Pfizer and BioNTech vaccine, up 20 years from a previous request.
The FDA told the court it can work faster than its previously proposed 500-pages-per-month rate, but it also said there are more than 59,000 more pages than mentioned in an earlier filing.
That discovery, and a desire to make sure it can work on other Freedom of Information Act requests at the same time, prompted the fresh request to the judge to allow production of roughly 12,000 pages by Jan. 31, 2022, and 500 pages per month thereafter.
That timeline would take it until at least 2096, Aaron Siri, a lawyer working on the case, wrote in a blog post.
“If you find what you are reading difficult to believe—that is because it is dystopian for the government to give Pfizer billions, mandate Americans to take its product, prohibit Americans from suing for harms, but yet refuse to let Americans see the data underlying its licensure,” Siri said.
The case was brought on behalf of the Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency, which stated that the FDA wasn’t complying with its request for data in a timely manner.
The group includes Dr. Carole Browner, a research professor at the University of California–Los Angeles’s David Geffen School of Medicine; Peter Doshi, an associate professor at the University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, and Dr. Harvey Risch, a professor of epidemiology at the Yale School of Public Health.
The group says the data should be made public quickly because the FDA spent just 108 days reviewing it before granting emergency use authorization to the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.
The matter is more urgent because millions of Americans are being mandated to take the shot or face repercussions, such as a loss of access to...
I'm Not One For Christmas Decorations, But If I Got A Letter Like This, My Neighbors Better Buy Shades!
What's The Going Price For A Tractor Trailer Delivery?
Customs and Border Protection To Host ‘Unconscious Bias’ Seminar During Immigration Crisis
Amid an immigration crisis, Customs and Border Protection this month is offering a seminar on "unconscious bias" for all staff.
According to an internal memo obtained by the Washington Free Beacon, CBP will on Dec. 10 host a "virtual discussion" between a senior Border Patrol official and Susan Fleming, a self-described expert in "gender bias," on the topic of "the impact of stereotypes and unconscious biases in the workplace." Attendance is optional for all staff.
The discussion "will draw on academic research, business experience, and unique perspectives to explore the complex web of beliefs and biases that influence our interactions with colleagues, as well as discussing strategies for individuals and organizations to start overcoming unconscious biases," the memo reads.
The emphasis on diversity and equity throughout the Department of Homeland Security began shortly after the last presidential election, with the agency on Dec. 31, 2020, releasing its "Inclusive Diversity Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2021-2024." The Free Beacon last month reported on an internal memo from DHS that outlines the department's priorities for the 2022 fiscal year. Chief among those was "diversity, equity, and inclusion" (DEI), which ranked above "customer experience" and "cybersecurity."
Staff within the agency say political appointees have a near obsession with new DEI initiatives, even as the country sees an all-time high number of illegal immigrants attempting to enter the country. The 2021 fiscal year saw more migrants apprehended at the southern border than any year on record.
"CBP doesn't have the people to properly patrol our nation's borders but we do have the time to step away from work hours to have a conversation on ‘unconscious bias,'" a senior DHS official told the Free Beacon.
The official noted the planned attendance of CBP acting commissioner Troy Miller as evidence of how the embrace of DEI initiatives comes from the most senior levels of the agency. Miller will be soon replaced by former Tucson police chief Chris Magnus, a champion of softer policing tactics and more liberal immigration policies such as "sanctuary cities."
DEI initiatives, according to the senior staffer, have demoralized many employees at DHS. The federal employee vaccine mandate, as well as political pressure to deprioritize deportations and border security, have made many question the very purpose of...
I Think We Need A New Direction....
Last night saw me in Detroit
Home town boy lookin' good
Ride like we stink in the daylight
Play rock and roll like I should
White line
Double time
Comin' 'round with a hammer, hammer, hammer hammerdown
VAERS Data Indicates the Covid Vaccines Have Killed A Minimum Of 140,000 Americans...
To get an idea of just how dangerous the current Covid vaccines are, we only need to look at the numbers in the government authorized VAERS database.
As you may know, VAERS is an acronym for Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. This system is co-maintained by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This is how the FDA describes this facility on its website:
“VAERS is an early warning system used to monitor adverse events that happen after vaccination. VAERS is the frontline system of a comprehensive vaccine safety monitoring program in the United States… VAERS gives vaccine safety experts valuable information so they can assess possible vaccine safety concerns, including the new COVID-19 vaccines. It is especially useful for detecting unusual or unexpected patterns of health problems (also called “adverse events”) that might indicate a possible safety problem with a vaccine.”Established in 1990, the idea behind VAERS is to capture as many adverse reactions to vaccines as possible in order to alert health experts to potential issues and problems.
The graph below traces the number of deaths that have been reported to VAERS every year since its inception. As you can see, the yearly levels have held relatively steady from 1990 until 2020 and were generally under 400 cases. The cumulative total of all reported deaths during those years comes to 5,178 (see VAERS analysis here).
This, however, changed dramatically toward the end of 2020 when the Covid vaccines were introduced. At that point we see a rapid explosion in reported deaths. So exponential was the increase that the graph line shoots up almost vertically.
See the link for the chart source here.
As of November 26, 2021, the number of deaths reported to VAERS in connection with the Covid vaccines was 19,532. It is both astonishing and revealing that in the last 11 months there were more reports of vaccine deaths related to Covid shots than to all other vaccines combined during the previous three decades.
This should raise all kinds of red flags, because it is a good indication that there may be something seriously wrong with the Covid vaccines, and that these hastily authorized pharmaceuticals are causing death on an unprecedented scale.
The 19,532 tally does not, however, give us an accurate picture of the situation. To get a sense of the true state affairs, this number needs to be adjusted for two very important factors. The first concerns the nature of VAERS data itself, while the second relates to the way in which it is collected.
Adjustment for causality
To begin with, we need to recognize that not all deaths reported to VAERS are due to the vaccines. To see why, we need understand the difference between a temporal and causal connection. Even though the bulk of reported deaths normally occur within a relatively short time of vaccination – usually from days to weeks – it does not necessarily mean that all those who have died after having taken the vaccine perished because of it. In some cases, people who appear among VAERS entries died of causes unrelated to the vaccine, and they just happened to receive their injections in temporal proximity of their passing.
In order not to overstate the case when considering VAERS data, it is, therefore, important to keep in mind that reported cases do not necessarily imply causality. The question, then, becomes in what proportion of VAERS entries a causal link can be established.
To help us make this assessment we use the findings of a peer-reviewed study which examined this issue. The title of the study is “Causality Assessment of Adverse Events Reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).” The study was published in 2012 and you can view it at this link at the National Library of Medicine.
The study found a “definite” or “probable” causal link between the vaccine and the adverse event in...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)