Friday, March 25, 2022
Thursday, March 24, 2022
SHoot To THrill..
I'm going to take you down
Oh, down, down, down
So, don't you fool around
I'm gonna pull it, pull it
Pull the trigger
Shoot to thrill, play to kill
Too many women with too many pills, yeah
Shoot to thrill, play to kill
I got my gun at the ready, gonna fire at will, yeah
A Radicalized Federal Reserve is a National Economic Threat
Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical Left and Islamic terrorism.
Earlier this month the Biden administration's nomination of Sarah Bloom Raskin as a top bank regulator fell apart. Raskin, who favored using monetary policy to crush the oil and gas industry while rewarding the subsidized wind and solar boondoggles of politically connected investors, was blocked by Senator Manchin who announced he would not vote for the radical.
“The Federal Reserve Board is not an institution that should politicize its critical decisions. This is a 10-year term to perhaps the most important independent body that is tasked with ensuring the stability of the American economy. At this historic moment for both the United States and the world at large, it is imperative the Federal Reserve Board preserves its independence and steers clear of any hint of partisanship," Manchin stated.
He urged the Fed to focus on fighting inflation instead of pursuing political agendas.
This was the second radical financial nomination the Biden administration had lost after Saule Omarova: a Soviet trained academic who wanted the Federal Reserve to nationalize banking.
These two high-profile defeats don’t appear to have taught the Biden administration anything.
Still waiting in the wings is Lisa Cook’s nomination to the Federal Reserve Board. Cook is unqualified for the position and she’s only being nominated because of her radical racial views.
Cook has promoted police defunding, advocated for slavery reparations, and declared that, “free speech has its limits”. Beyond her abrasive social media presence, Cook’s academic work, such as it is, is oriented toward identity politics and blaming racism for economic disparities.
She's the co-author of a New York Times op-ed titled, "It Was a Mistake for Me to Choose This Field" which falsely claims that, "if economics is hostile to women, it is especially antagonistic to black women". This familiar brand of professional victimhood is the last thing the Fed needs.
Despite all this, Lisa Cook was selected for the board of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. This is part of a larger phenomenon in which local Fed boards have already been politicized.
The involvement of local Fed boards in politics includes the false claim by the New York Fed that America suffers from "systemic racism" and that "economic equality is a critical component for social justice". These are not only economically misguided views, but they're particularly dangerous when advocated by bodies with the power to manipulate...
The left's aggressive assault on American values continues apace
They began attacking all things even vaguely religious decades ago and have successfully eroded church membership to the lowest point in our history. Judeo-Christian values were an impediment to their agenda. Black Lives Matter, for example, has made no secret of its goal to destroy the nuclear family.
For nearly fifty years, the left has worked diligently to take over our universities and now has its grip on K–12 education. Students of all ages are now carefully taught to hate America, to hate all law enforcement, to believe all sorts of nonsense such as that one's gender identity can be chosen rather than be determined in the womb. That anyone takes this particular bit of insanity seriously should be shocking, but it is now de rigueur for the properly woke.
Students are taught that man-made climate change will bring about the end of the world. That is one of their biggest hoaxes. As masses of people around the world bought into the manufactured fear of a virus sold to us by a cabal of sinister operatives — Klaus Schwab of the WEF, the detestable Anthony Fauci, everyone at the WHO, the FDA and the CDC, and the Biden administration — the country has tipped over a cliff and is falling into an abyss only Huxley and Orwell could have imagined.
Elementary schools are actively pushing kids into gender and sexual confusion at ages far too young for them to grasp the meaning of this diabolical scheme. The left does not believe in parental rights with regard to sexual issues or curriculum. Thus, the DOJ has designated as terrorists parents who disagree with that extreme position.
Critical Race Theory, which the majority of parents oppose, is teaching racism; children are being taught to judge others first and foremost by the color of their skin. If white, they are taught they are guilty of the crimes of their ancestors. If black or brown, they are taught they can never succeed because of white privilege. MLK has been canceled. CRT is the most injurious thing to happen in education since segregation was ignominiously imposed on the children of the South.
Then there is the tenet that all police are racists and must be defunded. Much of this is due to the long-term efforts of George Soros, the aging Nazi collaborator whose mission seems to be to destroy not only the U.S., but all of Western civilization. For decades, he has used his billions to undermine all that was good about America.
"It is a sort of disease when you consider yourself some kind of god, the creator of everything, but I feel comfortable about it now since I began to live it out."
—George Soros, 1993, The Independent (h/t Mark Wauck)
He has many partners and acolytes, like Klaus Schwab and his WEF. Graduates of his Young Leaders Program over the decades are doing the WEF's dirty work around the world. Graduates include Justin Trudeau, Jacinda Ardern of N.Z., Pete Buttigieg, Nikki Haley, Chelsea Clinton, Paul Krugman, Bill Gates, and many other names you may recognize. Check out the list. What do they all have in common in the recent past? They are almost all proponents of the Great Reset, a one-world government run by them. They are also mostly virulently pro-vaccine for COVID. They have actively denounced the now obvious fact that the virus was man-made and they ignore the fact that tens of thousands of people have been killed by the jabs; they are still pushing them. Not one of them seems to support the primacy of the individual or medical freedom. They are cultists who, as a group, oppose even freedom of speech.
These globalists are enemies of the American people, of people all around the world whom they deem expendable, deplorable. Those who believe that the vaccines are part of a malign plan are dismissed as conspiracy nuts, but the mortality rate of people ages 25–44 has risen by 84%! They may not be crazy. Something is very, very rotten in Denmark, as Shakespeare's Marcellus of Hamlet observed. Not only is the Soros-left actively undermining what is left of the West's morality, but it may well be actively using both the bio-weapon COVID virus and the vaccines to reduce the world's population. Sounds like bad science fiction, but the vaccines are causing death and injuries around the world. Calling Bill Gates, the self-appointed vaccine guru. We are living in interesting and dangerous times.
The self-identified elites and those masters of social media have inordinate and undeserved power over us all — enough to shutter small businesses throughout the nation and command us to be jabbed with an experimental bit of gene therapy. They desperately want to abrogate our Second Amendment and have essentially expunged our...
"It is a sort of disease when you consider yourself some kind of god, the creator of everything, but I feel comfortable about it now since I began to live it out."
—George Soros, 1993, The Independent (h/t Mark Wauck)
He has many partners and acolytes, like Klaus Schwab and his WEF. Graduates of his Young Leaders Program over the decades are doing the WEF's dirty work around the world. Graduates include Justin Trudeau, Jacinda Ardern of N.Z., Pete Buttigieg, Nikki Haley, Chelsea Clinton, Paul Krugman, Bill Gates, and many other names you may recognize. Check out the list. What do they all have in common in the recent past? They are almost all proponents of the Great Reset, a one-world government run by them. They are also mostly virulently pro-vaccine for COVID. They have actively denounced the now obvious fact that the virus was man-made and they ignore the fact that tens of thousands of people have been killed by the jabs; they are still pushing them. Not one of them seems to support the primacy of the individual or medical freedom. They are cultists who, as a group, oppose even freedom of speech.
These globalists are enemies of the American people, of people all around the world whom they deem expendable, deplorable. Those who believe that the vaccines are part of a malign plan are dismissed as conspiracy nuts, but the mortality rate of people ages 25–44 has risen by 84%! They may not be crazy. Something is very, very rotten in Denmark, as Shakespeare's Marcellus of Hamlet observed. Not only is the Soros-left actively undermining what is left of the West's morality, but it may well be actively using both the bio-weapon COVID virus and the vaccines to reduce the world's population. Sounds like bad science fiction, but the vaccines are causing death and injuries around the world. Calling Bill Gates, the self-appointed vaccine guru. We are living in interesting and dangerous times.
The self-identified elites and those masters of social media have inordinate and undeserved power over us all — enough to shutter small businesses throughout the nation and command us to be jabbed with an experimental bit of gene therapy. They desperately want to abrogate our Second Amendment and have essentially expunged our...
Meet, Meet You In The Ladies Room....
Meet, meet you in the ladies room
I'll meet you, greet you in the ladies room
For my money, you can't be too soon
Meet you, greet you in the ladies room
I'll meet you, greet you in the ladies room
For my money, you can't be too soon
Globalists Release Timeline for Health Tyranny
For example, when 9/11 suspect Philip Zelikow takes to the pages of Foreign Affairs to “warn” about the “eminent threat” of “Catastrophic Terrorism” that, “like Pearl Harbor,” will “divide our past and future into a before and after,” you’d better believe his neocon cronies are about to deliver a 9/11 to the public.
When Bill Gates “warns” us that “we’re not ready” for what he calls “the next epidemic,” you’d better believe that he’s using his monopolization of global “health” to prime the pump for the COVID scamdemic.
When Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping release a joint statement vowing to “accelerate the implementation of the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development” by cooperating on “key areas” like “vaccines and epidemics control, financing for development, climate change, sustainable development, including green development, industrialization, digital economy, and infrastructure connectivity,” you’d better believe they are actively collaborating on the promotion of an AI-driven, Fourth Industrial Revolution globalist agenda with their WEF cronies.
And when the globalists release a detailed timeline telling you exactly what the next steps are in the rollout of the global biosecurity security state, you’d better believe they are hard at work erecting that enslavement grid as we speak.
Luckily for us, we do not need to be mind readers or fortune-tellers to know what the globalists are preparing for our dystopian future. We simply have to read their documents. And boy, have they released some real doozies in the past month: three documents that lay out a precise timeline and an overview of what they’re hoping to achieve and how they’re hoping to achieve it.
Today, let’s examine these documents so that we can better understand what we’re up against and form a more effective plan for derailing this agenda of control.
DOCUMENT #1: The European Council’s Handy-dandy Infographic Timeline
Earlier this month, the European Council released a document laying out the EUreaucrats’ own timetable for the implementation of global health tyranny. Entitled “Infographic – Towards an international treaty on pandemics,” it cuts down on all those complicated linguistic thingies—what do you call them again? words?—and reduces the complexities of a legally binding global pandemic treaty down to the lowest common denominator: the “infographic.”
With this Buzzfeed-worthy gimmick in hand, the European Council wastes no time in getting down to business, informing us that “On 3 March 2022, the Council adopted a decision to authorize the opening of negotiations for an international agreement on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response” before patting itself on the back for its role in proposing the idea of a global pandemic treaty in the first place:
So far, so unsurprising. This is the exact kind of mealy-mouthed “global approach” blah blah blah “common cause” yadda yadda “protecting health” pabulum that you would expect the global technocratic class to administer in a document like this.
Then, they lay out an incredibly abbreviated history of how we have arrived at the proposal for a global health tyranny.
You’ll note that this curiously truncated “history” unhelpfully informs you that 2021 was “only the second time in WHO history that its governing body . . . met for a second time in the same year” without bothering to link you to the list of World Health Assembly meetings. If they had bothered to do so, as I do here, you could see for yourself that the first time this two-meetings-in-one-year event happened was back in 2006, when the WHO met in May to discuss “Strengthening pandemic-influenza preparedness and response” in the context of the newly revised International Health Regulations and then again in November of that year to appoint Margaret Chan as the organization’s Executive Director.
It’s not hard to understand why they leave out that part of the history, though. Not only would it be too much information to include in their childish infographic, it also might have prompted you to learn more about the creation of the “public health emergency of international concern” that lewas then invoked by Chan during the ginned-up swine flu “pandemic” of 2009 (and again during the ebola “pandemic” of 2014) to justify the consolidation of WHO powers in the dawning era of biosecurity. And, obviously, that kind of history is not what the European Council is...
Earlier this month, the European Council released a document laying out the EUreaucrats’ own timetable for the implementation of global health tyranny. Entitled “Infographic – Towards an international treaty on pandemics,” it cuts down on all those complicated linguistic thingies—what do you call them again? words?—and reduces the complexities of a legally binding global pandemic treaty down to the lowest common denominator: the “infographic.”
With this Buzzfeed-worthy gimmick in hand, the European Council wastes no time in getting down to business, informing us that “On 3 March 2022, the Council adopted a decision to authorize the opening of negotiations for an international agreement on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response” before patting itself on the back for its role in proposing the idea of a global pandemic treaty in the first place:
Then, they lay out an incredibly abbreviated history of how we have arrived at the proposal for a global health tyranny.
You’ll note that this curiously truncated “history” unhelpfully informs you that 2021 was “only the second time in WHO history that its governing body . . . met for a second time in the same year” without bothering to link you to the list of World Health Assembly meetings. If they had bothered to do so, as I do here, you could see for yourself that the first time this two-meetings-in-one-year event happened was back in 2006, when the WHO met in May to discuss “Strengthening pandemic-influenza preparedness and response” in the context of the newly revised International Health Regulations and then again in November of that year to appoint Margaret Chan as the organization’s Executive Director.
It’s not hard to understand why they leave out that part of the history, though. Not only would it be too much information to include in their childish infographic, it also might have prompted you to learn more about the creation of the “public health emergency of international concern” that lewas then invoked by Chan during the ginned-up swine flu “pandemic” of 2009 (and again during the ebola “pandemic” of 2014) to justify the consolidation of WHO powers in the dawning era of biosecurity. And, obviously, that kind of history is not what the European Council is...
Twitter Cites French Law to Punish Outlet That Told the Truth About Biden's Transgender Assistant Health Secretary
Twitter shut down the account of the U.S.-based Christian Post for accurately describing President Joe Biden’s transgender assistant health secretary, Rachel Levine, as a man — and the social media giant cited a foreign law to justify its actions.
The evangelical Christian outlet told its readers on Monday that its Twitter account had been “temporarily limited” because of a tweet about Levine, a man who identifies as female.
The Christian Post said it was told by Twitter it no longer would be able to post anything new and could not like or follow other users or retweet posts.
The outlet was further informed that it would be suspended from Twitter for 12 hours.
The “offensive” tweet was the Christian Post’s March 15 message that read, “USA Today names Rachel Levine, a man, among its ‘Women of the Year.'”
As of Wednesday afternoon, the tweet was replaced by a message that reads, “This Tweet violated the Twitter Rules. Learn more.”
The outlet said it was told it had been “flagged for possible violations of Twitter’s hateful conduct policy.” This policy, Twitter said, is based on France’s Law for Confidence in the Digital Economy.
“Publishing content that is obviously unlawful under Article 6 of the LCEN law or that amounts to hate speech under the LCEN law can lead to civil and criminal penalties,” Twitter’s email to the Christian Post read.
The social media giant went on to inform the outlet that if it didn’t like the punishment, it could take its case before a French court.
“If you believe the withheld content does not violate the French law,” Twitter told the Christian Post, “you may challenge the above decision by filing an appeal. You can also challenge this decision in a French court of justice.”
French law was not the only foreign law that Twitter said the outlet may have “violated.” The company also said it investigated the Christian Post’s tweets to see if they violated...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)