Teachers, unions, and “free speech advocates” argue that more school curriculum transparency would be equivalent to “educational gag orders,” experts told NBC News.
State lawmakers in at least 12 states across the U.S. have introduced legislation to promote more school transparency by requiring teachers to post educational materials online, NBC News reported. Conservatives see more transparency as a way to prevent controversial curricula such as race-based education, critical race theory, and sexually graphic books.
Critical race theory holds that America is fundamentally racist, yet it teaches people to view every social interaction and person in terms of race. Its adherents pursue “anti-racism” through the end of merit, objective truth, and the adoption of race-based policies.
“People are going to disagree on a lot of these issues,” Matt Beienburg, the Goldwater Institute’s director of education policy, told NBC News. “Transparency is something I think that at least allows for that conversation to know what is being taught. Everybody should be able to rally around the fact that we shouldn’t be teaching something in secret.”
Public schools have become battlegrounds for culture wars over mask rules, COVID-19 vaccinations, school reopenings, critical race theory, and remote learning. Parents have called on school boards across the country to allow them more of a say in what their children are being taught.
In Virginia, Gov. Glenn Youngkin defeated Democrat Terry McAuliffe with the help of parents who were fed up with the current administration and the state’s policies, and made it clear they wanted to see change in the state’s education system.
He promised to ban concepts like critical race theory and to put parents first. McAuliffe slipped out of favor when he claimed critical race theory was a “racist dog whistle” and made the assertion that he doesn’t think parents should be telling schools what they should teach.
“We reject the notion that parents shouldn’t have a say in what their kids are learning in school,” Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis said in a Jan. 11 speech.
Chris Rufo, journalist and anti-critical race theory proponent, has been critical of teachers unions who “don’t want families to see what’s happening in the classroom.”
The Goldwater Institute, along with the Manhattan Institute, have published model legislation that encourages curriculum transparency.
But opponents of transparency legislation believe it would put an unnecessary burden on teachers and restrict the materials they teach out of fear of criticism, according to experts, NBC reported.
Legislation supporting more educational transparency through the use of “neutral sounding language” is “potentially just as censorious,” Jon Friedman, the director of free expression and education at PEN America, a nonprofit group that promotes free speech, told NBC News.
In 2021, nine states—Idaho, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, Arizona, and North Dakota—passed legislation that prohibits teaching students that the U.S. is inherently racist. Although, none of the laws mention critical race theory by name, NBC News reported.
PEN America has even equated such laws to “educational gag orders.” Friedman said the newly proposed transparency laws are meant to stoke concern over lessons about race and gender in schools.
A curriculum transparency bill proposed in Missouri would require teachers to post instructional material along with descriptions of the content.
Conservatives argue educators should have nothing to hide, while Democrats believe it will be used as an “easy tool to censor anything controversial,” according to Missouri state Rep. Maggie Nurrenbern, NBC News reported.
The Goldwater Institute issued a policy brief in January 2020 advocating state curriculum transparency laws, which Beienburg said could be implemented if teachers posted links to instruction materials on...
Read More HERE
3 comments:
How these vermin twist the meaning of words to fit their usage... Transparency is a gag order how, exactly?
- Teachers won't post certain things b/c they don't want to cause trouble (with what they're posting)
... Which is exactly the fucking point to having you post it! So we can raise some shit if you're teaching incorrect or objectionable shit to our kids!!!
.. but they paint themselves as the victims here. Fucking whack-o's, they shouldn't be allowed near children, let alone teaching them.
Interesting as a product of public school from the 60's to 70's I was taught no skin color at all. "Skin color does not matter but your character does". Now look today = "judge EVERYTHING through lens of skin color". And no, I will not. I don't give a flying EFF what "skin color" you are. Do. Not. Care.
Remember that even if we get more transparency it is still the job of the parent to ACTIVELY monitor what their kids are learning. I have done almost daily pre-brief/debriefs with my sons from the time that they first entered kindergarten (they didn't attend pre-school) because I know that this sort of thing was happening even when I was attending in the 70s and 80s.
Even if we get these laws in place, the push will be to "comply" with the least possible amount of effort and information provided. These Marxists WILL continue to actively subvert your children, so only constant vigilance will slow down the attempt.
Post a Comment