90 Miles From Tyranny : Because Mueller Found No Collusion, Trump Should Pardon Michael Flynn

Tuesday, April 2, 2019

Because Mueller Found No Collusion, Trump Should Pardon Michael Flynn



Michael Flynn was framed so certain unethical officials could eventually set up Trump. Now that we know there was no collusion, Trump should pardon Flynn.

According to a House Intelligence Committee report in 2018, former FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe stated the agents who interviewed Michael Flynn “didn’t think he was lying.” Like McCabe, former FBI director James Comey testified to Congress that Flynn did not lie to FBI agents.

After the Mueller report confirmed no collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government, in addition to no obstruction by President Trump, it’s important to remember that former FBI agent Peter Strzok interviewed Flynn. Yes, the same Peter Strzok who texted he had spoken about an “insurance policy” (referring to the Russia probe) with McCabe and told FBI lawyer Lisa Page “we’ll stop” Trump from winning the election.

Strzok also deleted references to “gross negligence” in Comey’s exoneration speech for Hillary Clinton, ensuring that she wouldn’t be indicted under 18 U.S. Code 793 (which states even gross negligence in the mishandling of classified data is a crime). Strzok was eventually fired from the Mueller probe and the FBI. McCabe and James Baker, two of the top FBI officials during both the Clinton email scandal and Russia probes, are now under criminal investigation.

Comey leaked classified memos to start the Mueller probe and the initial Russia investigation started reportedly because of gossip by Alexander Downer “during a night of heavy drinking” and a Christopher Steele dossier Clinton purchased. In addition, few people in the country realize that “Company 1” in Mueller’s indictments of Russian intel officers refers to Crowdstrike, a third-party tech firm outsourced by Clinton and the Democratic National Committee since their reportedly hacked servers were never given to the U.S. government.

Was Michael Flynn Wrongly Victimized?

If this all seems like a setup, that’s because it was. Flynn was the first victim in an unprecedented attempt at framing Donald Trump of collusion with Russia. Imagine the outrage from Democrats if Trump had purchased an unverified “dossier” that resulted in a Clinton probe, or allegations she colluded with a foreign power. Democrats and people like former CIA director John Brennan used suspicion emanating from the Steele dossier to justify investigating a possible criminal act, not an actual criminal endeavor committed by Trump.

There was never any evidence of a grandiose conspiracy to collude with Russian President Vladimir Putin, much less the existence of a specific crime linked to Trump. In terms of Flynn and his discussions with...

Read More HERE

2 comments:

  1. Keep in mind that Mike Flynn was targeted because:
    a. He had fought with Brennan and Clapper over pressure to downplay the threat from ISIS while at DIA, and
    b. He had submitted statements supporting a friend at that FBI who was suing the Bureau for harassment and discrimination.
    Thus taking his scalp was on the To Do list for two of the major players behind the coup plot.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Absolutely, a pardon post haste. As well, give him the intel to civilly impoverish those behind his criminally malicious legal assault. He should be allowed to sue these bureaucratic despots to poverty and see them in prison for the rest of their lives.

    Why is Trump surrendering on so many of these issues? Burn the anti-American bureaucrats.

    ReplyDelete

Test Word Verification