A British Journalist Calls Biden’s Election Victory 'Rigged'

A look at his case - and at American silence.

A British journalist, writing in one of the world's most respected newspapers, recently declared something that almost none of his American colleagues dare to utter: Last year's presidential election was rigged for Joe Biden.

Rod Liddle, associate editor of The Spectator, made that assertion in The Times of London on Sept. 26. In doing so, he also blistered Biden's incompetence and physical problems, which the leftist U.S. Establishment Media also largely ignores.

"The American public is slowly waking up to the fact that they are being led by an ineffectually devious, senile halfwit," Liddle wrote. "Soon the public will wake up to something even more unpleasant and sinister: that the last presidential election was a fraud, rigged by big business, the labor unions and, more than anything, the media and the tech companies.

"If that election had taken place in any other country, it would have been called 'unfree.'"

FrontPage Magazine has previously discussed the possibility of foreign and domestic 2020 election interference in "Beijing is Called For Biden," "Why Trump Will Win" and "The Serbian Connection.”

But Liddle -- who edits a publication with nearly 200 years of credibility as the world's oldest weekly magazine -- ventures beyond possibility. He states his charge as categorical fact.

So far, no American commentator has rebutted his accusation, which attacks the fiber of American political legitimacy.

Liddle made his assertions while Arizona's Maricopa County was conducting a forensic audit of the November election's votes. That audit found numerous discrepancies.

For example, 3,432 more ballots were cast than there were people who voted. Nearly 300 dead people voted. There were more than 17,000 duplicate votes. More than 23,000 voters who mailed their ballots did so after the mail-in deadline. Of those, more than 9,000 returned more ballots than they received.

Biden won Arizona by 10,457 votes but the audit showed problems with more than 50,000 ballots in Maricopa County. Other states are considering similar audits.

Liddle's criticism, however, excludes support for President Donald Trump. He displayed his contempt for Biden's predecessor when mentioning Trump's lead in opinion polls. "Imagine how awful a president must be if people would rather that sack of meat with mittens were back in charge," Liddle wrote.

Yet contempt for Trump, in Liddle's view, fails to justify what the columnist calls "a grotesque manipulation of democracy," even if Trump was "unhinged," with Liddle quoting one of the favorite phrases Trump's detractors used.

"Was he?" Liddle asked. "I don’t know. He didn’t seem terribly hinged to me, but then Americans rarely do. But more unhinged than your average American -- or...

Read More HERE